Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
pmcw
User Rank
Manager
re: Eight reasons why IC downgrade was baseless
pmcw   11/26/2009 3:05:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Stock performance is always the absolute measure. However, in this case, the claim is excess inventory will cause under-performance. If you read my full article on the subject, which includes data from tech companies that will report aggregate revenue this year of about $650B, you'll see my position is well documented. It was the BoA analyst that offered literally no substantiation for his claim. Personally, I think for one to be right he or she must nail both cause and affect - less than that is a lucky guess. Regards, Paul

rkeist
User Rank
Rookie
re: Eight reasons why IC downgrade was baseless
rkeist   11/25/2009 5:30:27 PM
NO RATINGS
so....let's check back on this thread in 3,6,9,12 months and see who called it right. We will look at the performance of the big 3 (SNPS,MENT,CDNS) on an absolute level as well as a relative level against the S&P 500. Start date is 11/23 or the date of Sumit's report if it is known. This is to answer the question of which analyst is best at their job of predicting the future: 1. Sumit of BoA -predicts these stocks will not outperform. 2. Paul of NITR - predicts that Sumit is wrong. 3. Craig of FBR - ditto. I'm betting on Sumit but only based on the weakness and vagueness of the list of arguments presented in this article. I've not read Sumit's original remarks on why he downgraded. Paul says "The sky is not falling" -- Sumit merely moved his recommendation from buy to neutral. Craig is here committing the "Straw Man fallacy (Fallacy Of Extension): attacking an exaggerated or caricatured version of your opponent's position." His arguments here are similarly weak and meaningless, non-specific and hard to follow.

GeniusEE
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Eight reasons why IC downgrade was baseless
GeniusEE   11/24/2009 12:57:47 AM
NO RATINGS
You can't always "buy". The market has rallied significantly since March and has anticipated and factored 1Q 2010 in already. The double booking is a bunch of hogwash. Leadtimes, if anything, have tempered a full recovery of semis to almost mediocre rates, with some leadtimes now being as long as 26 weeks. Nobody is flush with cash enough, or has a credit line anymore, to buy double of anything and distributors are not doing their jobs to low pass filter customer demand. It'll be a sluggish plod upwards because we're all afraid to boom again.



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).