Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
pmcw
User Rank
Manager
re: Eight reasons why IC downgrade was baseless
pmcw   11/26/2009 3:05:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Stock performance is always the absolute measure. However, in this case, the claim is excess inventory will cause under-performance. If you read my full article on the subject, which includes data from tech companies that will report aggregate revenue this year of about $650B, you'll see my position is well documented. It was the BoA analyst that offered literally no substantiation for his claim. Personally, I think for one to be right he or she must nail both cause and affect - less than that is a lucky guess. Regards, Paul

rkeist
User Rank
Rookie
re: Eight reasons why IC downgrade was baseless
rkeist   11/25/2009 5:30:27 PM
NO RATINGS
so....let's check back on this thread in 3,6,9,12 months and see who called it right. We will look at the performance of the big 3 (SNPS,MENT,CDNS) on an absolute level as well as a relative level against the S&P 500. Start date is 11/23 or the date of Sumit's report if it is known. This is to answer the question of which analyst is best at their job of predicting the future: 1. Sumit of BoA -predicts these stocks will not outperform. 2. Paul of NITR - predicts that Sumit is wrong. 3. Craig of FBR - ditto. I'm betting on Sumit but only based on the weakness and vagueness of the list of arguments presented in this article. I've not read Sumit's original remarks on why he downgraded. Paul says "The sky is not falling" -- Sumit merely moved his recommendation from buy to neutral. Craig is here committing the "Straw Man fallacy (Fallacy Of Extension): attacking an exaggerated or caricatured version of your opponent's position." His arguments here are similarly weak and meaningless, non-specific and hard to follow.

GeniusEE
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Eight reasons why IC downgrade was baseless
GeniusEE   11/24/2009 12:57:47 AM
NO RATINGS
You can't always "buy". The market has rallied significantly since March and has anticipated and factored 1Q 2010 in already. The double booking is a bunch of hogwash. Leadtimes, if anything, have tempered a full recovery of semis to almost mediocre rates, with some leadtimes now being as long as 26 weeks. Nobody is flush with cash enough, or has a credit line anymore, to buy double of anything and distributors are not doing their jobs to low pass filter customer demand. It'll be a sluggish plod upwards because we're all afraid to boom again.



EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Steve Wozniak Reacts to Latest iPhone
Max Maxfield
6 comments
Funnily enough, just a few days ago as I pen these words, I was chatting with my wife (Gina the Gorgeous) when she informed me that -- as a kid -- she had never played at making a ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)