Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 6   >   >>
old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Vinyl vs. CD myths refuse to die
old account Frank Eory   6/12/2012 11:58:01 PM
NO RATINGS
I have to disagree here. The sound being picked up by the mic, amplified and then sampled is, in your example, two waveforms of equal frequency but differing phase. As you mentioned, that phase difference is what provides spatial cue information. But an ideal sampler (sample & hold) does not average anything -- it simply takes a snapshot of the voltage at its input at a precise instant in time, at each active edge of the sampling clock. That sampling clock can be as fast as you want it to be, within the limits of technology or your budget. At this point, we haven't digitized anything yet -- we've simply captured the analog signal (voltage) at discrete points in time, and held it at a constant value until the next sampling time. If that -- holding the value constant -- is troublesome to you, then lets increase the sampling rate so those sampling times are closer together. The faster we sample, the more closely the voltage held on that capacitor in the S/H resembles an unsampled continuous analog waveform. If I still haven't convinced you this is true, then let's increase the sampling rate some more. Nevermind 192 kHz or whatever, let's go for 100 MHz, or maybe 10 GHz. Now do you believe the voltage on that capacitor is for all practical purposes indistinguishable from a continuous analog waveform? Remember, this is audio, so the high end of its frequency spectrum is far lower than 10 GHz -- much closer to 20-something kHz in fact.

buckbaran.com
User Rank
Rookie
re: Vinyl vs. CD myths refuse to die
buckbaran.com   5/3/2012 10:44:26 PM
NO RATINGS
I’m 60. In my childhood I listened to 78s, 33-1/3s and 45s. I do not miss vinyl. I do not miss the snap-crackle-pop in soft passages, scratches that cause skips, the loss of high end, shorter sides sounding louder than longer sides which are softer, space consumption, wasted cardboard, the large display of mostly crappy graphics, dust collecting, moving a weighty vinyl collection up to a friend’s third floor apartment, warping and washing off beverage stains from last night’s party. With the advancement in higher sampling rates and greater bit depths the sonic quality is greatly improved. Since I couldn’t find the old vinyl in my collection, I recently purchased a CD of “The Kingston Trio Live at the Hungry I” (circa 1959). I wasn’t sure what to expect. The re-mastering blew me away. The room tone was there. The frequencies, especially a sweet sweet bottom end. No loss of high end. No plastic nails scratching glass; a well-rounded sound. Except for clinking cocktail glasses, there was no noise; a thoroughly enjoyable listening experience. This romance with retro stuff is nonsense. We are supposed to be moving forward with technology, not going backward. Vinyl was a stepping stone. Let it go. Anyway this fad with vinyl seems to have the marks of someone heavily invested in recycled vinyl (which is not as flexible as virgin vinyl) and related tools, and has created a need so they can unload and get rich.

Lokio
User Rank
Rookie
re: Vinyl vs. CD myths refuse to die
Lokio   2/4/2012 2:06:13 AM
NO RATINGS
I have a home studio with nice monitors connected directly to a computer using a studio oriented sound card (with very wide dynamic range). This setup is notable for price performance and because it creates an opportunity for digital room correction, which nowadays you can do with miniature computers. The RME fireface is as close as anything to an industry standard. Echo Audiofires are notable for amazing value. These are products that are virtually indistinguishable from stuff that costs a lot more. Anything equal to or better than them will be fine.

rexpointon
User Rank
Rookie
re: Vinyl vs. CD myths refuse to die
rexpointon   2/3/2012 2:34:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Lokio and OmegaMan please let me know what systems you're listening to, I'm looking for a digital front end. thanks a bunch!

OmegaMan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Vinyl vs. CD myths refuse to die
OmegaMan   2/3/2012 2:23:40 PM
NO RATINGS
The best audio recording I have ever listened to is a CD, "The Nightfly" by Donald Fagan of Steely Dan fame. This CD was in DDD format, which I assume meant that it was recorded digitally rather than converted from an analog recording. The sound is wonderful, at any volume, and far surpasses any vinyl recording I have ever heard. Gives me goosebumps!

Lokio
User Rank
Rookie
re: Vinyl vs. CD myths refuse to die
Lokio   2/3/2012 3:07:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Steve jobs is dead because he ate herbs instead of having surgery. He was never an engineer or a scientist. He never let facts get in the way of his feelings. Analog 'warmth' is nice, but once you get used to high quality digital there's no going back. Its sad, but vinyl just sounds muffled now :(

seaEE
User Rank
CEO
re: Vinyl vs. CD myths refuse to die
seaEE   2/1/2012 7:46:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Read an article today in USA Today that according to Neil Young, Steve Jobs listened to vinyl records when at home instead of digital gizmos. More fuel for the fire! Let the arguments resume.

CreamOfWeber
User Rank
Rookie
re: Vinyl vs. CD myths refuse to die
CreamOfWeber   1/11/2012 10:04:31 PM
NO RATINGS
"Finally, I have to chuckle a bit when I read "...I record my vinyl to digital format and it sounds better than retail CDs..." Sound is subjective. So your chuckling really just goes to show how narrow minded you are. Someone tells you something SHOULD sound better... and like a sheep you believe it.

swen595
User Rank
Rookie
re: Vinyl vs. CD myths refuse to die
swen595   11/29/2011 2:24:41 AM
NO RATINGS
The most obvious difference between vinyl and CD is the ability to reproduce frequencies above 20khz. Just because we can't hear those frequencies on their own doesn't mean they don't effect the frequencies we can hear. Those overtones may be the difference between the ear fatigue that CD listening causes and the smooth high end that a high quality analog playback system provides.

rexpointon
User Rank
Rookie
re: Vinyl vs. CD myths refuse to die
rexpointon   9/22/2011 11:49:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes I've tried recording vinyl to cd and it just sounded like a cd with the clicks and pops of vinyl!

<<   <   Page 2 / 6   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Aging Brass: Cow Poop vs. Horse Doo-Doo
Max Maxfield
7 comments
As you may recall, one of the things I want to do with the brass panels I'm using in my Inamorata Prognostication Engine is to make them look really old. Since everything is being mounted ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
11 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
11 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)