Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
green_is_now
User Rank
Author
re: 3-D architecture promises new type of PLD
green_is_now   12/20/2012 1:04:24 AM
NO RATINGS
how will this technology be ranked in terms of security with this alway reconfiguring and re-using paradimes?

SOY
User Rank
Author
re: 3-D architecture promises new type of PLD
SOY   3/5/2010 2:45:18 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd like to write about architecture side and performance at first. The 3DPLD is probablly same as DPGA (in general, called multi-context FPGA) researched by Prof. A.DeHon (when he was PhD @ MIT, and currentlly he is in Penn Univ) who is one of evangelists of reconfigurable computing. At the same time (maybe 1996-97), Xilinx researcher also proposed time-multiplexed FPGA, moreover, earlly in 90s, Fujitsu got Patent for the multi-context approach. Developping architecture is easy, but how to schedule the context (task) is difficult for dynamically changing the context without deadlock and so on. I remember that some researcher has proposed such "3D placement" that 2D field of programming + time domain at previous decades. At view point of performance on chip-level not inside of it, throughput is decreased by the number of contexts, of course. And the dynamically changing is OVERHEAD on space and time in general, and thus breaking data-flows on the chip. Researchers want not to make dynamically change, so device is treated as possible as static device even if a device can change dynamically, in order to reduce the overheads. Some researcher concluded, "we must find killer application to use the dynamically change (thus reconfiguration) effectivelly". Unfortunatelly, such application is not yet found, time is past (one decade at least). In addition, I think key is how to use an inter-configuration communication proposed by B.Hutching (Prof. @ BYU). Regarding marketing side, 3D or DPGA must claim about application designers need not familiar with the device or its system, this means the device have to support or include current design process. So, the design tool will be more complex, or more tool-chains is necessary, probablly taking more time. Application designers face to time-to-market issue, no choice if it is not possible. So, not only killer application, but also traditional application should be enhanced at the design time or performance perspectives. Regards, SOY

schaferb
User Rank
Author
re: 3-D architecture promises new type of PLD
schaferb   3/3/2010 7:54:39 AM
NO RATINGS
With all the respect, but is this not a dynamically reconfigurable FPGA that NEC electronics already commercializes and calls it STP (stream transpose processor)? (http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/HONSHI/20081230/163439/)

Sundar Srinivasan
User Rank
Author
re: 3-D architecture promises new type of PLD
Sundar Srinivasan   3/2/2010 8:05:47 PM
NO RATINGS
The startup companies that introduce new reconfigurable architecture have a difficult time, because it's potential customers have established processes for existing technology that this new technology does not readily map to. Nobody wants to change the process. So unless these companies also offer the entire array of CAD tools to program their fabric, they may not succeed. http://sunnyeves.blogspot.com/

Caincom
User Rank
Author
re: 3-D architecture promises new type of PLD
Caincom   3/2/2010 5:33:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Failure of so many roconfigurable architectures seems to be about finding the right technology, educating the potential customers and strong, strong marketing more than about the specific architecture. This approach sounds a lot like Chameleon and they couldn't convince the users



Most Recent Comments
Susan Rambo
 
Joe164
 
TonyTib
 
rick merritt
 
m00nshine
 
Brian Fuller2
 
chip_maker
 
zeeglen
 
realjjj
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.

Brought to you by

July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday
IoT Network Shoot Out
Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...