Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
kalpak
User Rank
Rookie
re: Transistor-laser breaks Kirchhoff's Law, rewrites textbooks
kalpak   5/21/2010 2:54:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Or is it a stunt to get attention and some funding?

martinm_de
User Rank
Rookie
re: Transistor-laser breaks Kirchhoff's Law, rewrites textbooks
martinm_de   5/20/2010 12:36:06 PM
NO RATINGS
One of these articels which only serve to raise attention and help gettings funds. Remember the memristor? A device which was said to be the 4th basic element, like C R L memristor. If the law of charge conservation is violated, then., maybe by some extreme shorttime effects, where charge is squeezed together . Don't know whether this is doable. The Kirchhoff statement 'the charge flowing into the node in a certain time interval equals the charge flowing out of this node in the same interval' somehow implies that the said node should not have any charge storage (by whatever means) capabilities. If a node could store charge , like storing hydrogen in certain special metallic compounds, then Kirchhoff must indeed be rewritten 'the charge flowing into the node in a certain time interval equals the charge flowing out of this node in the same interval OR LATER ' . This assumes that the stored charge is released somewhat later. By the way, what about a transistor inside a flash memory? Isn't there some charge getting lost when flowing from source to drain and stored on the floating gate? The total charge pumped into the transistor source is never fully arriving at the drain, some of it goes onto the gate.

kalpak
User Rank
Rookie
re: Transistor-laser breaks Kirchhoff's Law, rewrites textbooks
kalpak   5/20/2010 11:32:35 AM
NO RATINGS
But that has been always so. Energy is conserved when current heats up a wire in a bulb and photons are emitted. So how is it different now?

colindente
User Rank
Rookie
re: Transistor-laser breaks Kirchhoff's Law, rewrites textbooks
colindente   5/20/2010 10:41:21 AM
NO RATINGS
Violation of Kirchoff's law seems unlikely - unless the device is emitting a lot of neutrinos as well - in which case we have proof of violation of charge conservation. Step aside Pons and Fleischmann! Actually, all Feng and Holonyak appear to be saying is that, in order to model this device properly, you need to account for the energy emitted as photons - so they've "extended" Kirchoff's current law to include energy conservation. They hav'na changed the laws o' physics cap'n.

YevgeniT
User Rank
Rookie
re: Transistor-laser breaks Kirchhoff's Law, rewrites textbooks
YevgeniT   5/20/2010 7:39:29 AM
NO RATINGS
The article is some late for 1-st April joke.

kalpak
User Rank
Rookie
re: Transistor-laser breaks Kirchhoff's Law, rewrites textbooks
kalpak   5/20/2010 4:53:09 AM
NO RATINGS
Does that mean some electrons are getting converted to photons? That would violate a lot more laws than just Kirchoff's.

freddy2010
User Rank
Rookie
re: Transistor-laser breaks Kirchhoff's Law, rewrites textbooks
freddy2010   5/19/2010 9:03:08 PM
NO RATINGS
This "transistor" DOES NOT break KCL, the model of the transistor is insufficient to describe its behavior (including losses and conversions). Why are you looking to break a fundamental EE accounting rule for any reason other than HYPE. As I said, most III-V transistors emit light, in fact anything that gets hot emits IR...oopsie - have we been wrong all these years? BS.

Frank Eory
User Rank
CEO
re: Transistor-laser breaks Kirchhoff's Law, rewrites textbooks
Frank Eory   5/17/2010 10:35:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Null, my point was simply that when dealing with multiple forms of energy in the same system -- in this case both electrical and optical energy -- Maxwell's equations are really what govern. The authors themselves understood and stated that what was important in analyzing this device was conservation of energy, not simply conservation of charge. To make our lives easy, we take the divergence of Ampere's Law and combine it with Gauss' Law to come up with the simplified equation we know as Kirchhoff's Current Law. It is only meant to be used at low frequencies -- where the operating wavelength is much larger than the physical dimensions of the circuit. It might at first glance appear that KCL is being violated by this new transistor, but on closer observation, it appears that charges are being accelerated at the junction by the E-field associated with the optical output. This does not imply that charge is being created out of nothing. It simply implies that the low-frequency simplification we refer to as KCL is insufficient to fully analyze the conservation of energy in this circuit. This is also not the first electro-optical circuit for which that is true. It is somewhat disingenuous to say this transistor breaks Kirchhoff's Law and requires a re-write of the textbooks. These guys know better...

Baolt
User Rank
Rookie
re: Transistor-laser breaks Kirchhoff's Law, rewrites textbooks
Baolt   5/14/2010 10:49:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Just closed my eyes and tried to dream when Mr.Kirchhoff made his statement to world how powerful and irritating feedbacks he got, after reviewing same fact again and again his statement became a law. Its true title of the topic is astonishing however without hitting words i dont think theyd be able to get any attention neither budget. The universe is established on such laws, which is just waiting to be discovered, we as human being should work and get knowledge of it. Personally i am also having serious doubts about this research however always open to see new ideas around since they are provable again at any time... To counterfellows who shared their ideas above, i have a question... What if the research is guiding us to another law? Just imagine what we could shape at out future with this?

Frank Eory
User Rank
CEO
re: Transistor-laser breaks Kirchhoff's Law, rewrites textbooks
Frank Eory   5/14/2010 10:19:39 PM
NO RATINGS
KCL is just a narrow special case solution of Maxwell's equations and there have always been situations in which KCL did not apply. New textbooks needed? I don't think so -- just a need to remember what we all learned in those old textbooks.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

The 10 Commandments of Electronics
Max Maxfield
5 comments
My chum Rick Curl dropped into my office this morning. We had both decided that we desperately needed some face-to-face time to talk about the current Doctor Who (our feelings are mixed at ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).