Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
phoenixdave
User Rank
Author
re: Apple iPhone antenna
phoenixdave   7/21/2010 12:37:51 AM
NO RATINGS
WSOCT -- Thanks for posting the analysis. Very well done....

Tunrayo
User Rank
Author
re: Apple iPhone antenna
Tunrayo   7/20/2010 2:29:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Now, here is Apple contradicting itself; if the iPhone 4 problem is due to a glitch in the Math responsible for displaying antenna bars corresponding to the level of received signal (RSSI), why have they give out rubber cases to iPhone 4 customers? Besides, I do not buy the idea of Apple consulting AT&T to determine the best formula for indicating how bars of signal strength are indicated on the iPhone 4g. This type of collaboration is anti-consumer - the air interfaces are standardized and Apple should just display what it measures of the air on its iPhone - AT&T should not be influencing this measurement. Finally, if Apple maintains it's the Math, then consumers can verify this by testing out a different phone at the same locations the iPhone 4 experiences signal degradation.

WSOCT
User Rank
Author
re: Apple iPhone antenna
WSOCT   7/15/2010 3:57:18 PM
NO RATINGS
An analysis was made of the iphone 4 antenna problem. http://idisk.mac.com/rfengr00-Public/web_pics/mw101/iPhone_4_antenna.pdf Clearly not a software problem. I've heard that very quietly Apple is exchanging customers iphone 4 with an improved "antenna" version. So, if yours is not working try to exchange it.

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
Author
re: Apple iPhone antenna
prabhakar_deosthali   7/14/2010 5:42:33 PM
NO RATINGS
It will now be appreciated if Apple acknowledges the problem, takes its customers into confidence and takes them alon with the solution path it has planned to solve this problem. A feeback/replay to all of us by Aplle spokesperson is in order.

nicolas.mokhoff
User Rank
Author
re: Apple iPhone antenna
nicolas.mokhoff   7/13/2010 3:59:17 PM
NO RATINGS
This antenna stuff all bodes unfavorably for Apple. Consumer Reports, which many consumer follow for smart buying decisions, is not recommending buying the iPhone4 until Apple fixes the "hardware" problem. It's not a matter of adjusting bars in software to suit clear reception.

selinz
User Rank
Author
re: Apple iPhone antenna
selinz   7/13/2010 3:09:06 PM
NO RATINGS
This entire scenario suggests that Apple needs to review their testing and qualification process. Embedding the antenna in the chassis brilliant? It's hardly brilliant if it doesn't serve the functional purpose. Quality and reliability are really secondary in this market. We have an iPod graveyard upstairs which is testimony to that. I was pleasantly surprised recently when an iPod was replaced by Apple more than 2 years out of warranty because of a "manufacturing defect." As long as phones last to the next phone upgrade, we usually don't care...

chanj0
User Rank
Author
re: Apple iPhone antenna
chanj0   7/12/2010 6:06:44 PM
NO RATINGS
The idea of embedded the antenna to the chassis is quite a brilliant idea; yet, whether it is engineering possible is still a question. I believe the situation will get better if Apple can stay quiet and focus on looking for a solution in addition to finding the root cause . Regardless of the current situation, iPhone 4 is still selling dozens. Bumper is going along with it (with a cost).

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Author
re: Apple iPhone antenna
elctrnx_lyf   7/12/2010 4:27:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Except Apple, all of us seems to have the same feeling :P

p51
User Rank
Author
re: Apple iPhone antenna
p51   7/12/2010 9:11:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Well we shall see if the software update does indeed prevent signal degradation when held in the same way. Though my feeling is, as others have already pointed out, won't improve things.

UIeye
User Rank
Author
re: Apple iPhone antenna
UIeye   7/9/2010 5:21:15 PM
NO RATINGS
I would recommend that AT&T offer free service for new IPhone customers for a few months while they are fixing the problem.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...