Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
docdivakar   9/21/2010 5:56:08 PM
NO RATINGS
The wait is going to be longer for using EUV at 16nm. At Nikon's LithoVision San Jose this year, Nikon made announcements that EUV's availability at 16nm (they missed for 22nm!) is pushed to dates 2012 or later. I like Mr. Sawicki's take on 3D. Sure enough, the most optimum and reliable 3D stacked system is the one that is homogeneous. But this is years away from productization. There needs to be a sea change of capabilities and features implemented in the current 2D (or 2.5D) EDA tools. Circuit simulators need to work side by side with field simulators (emag, thermal & stress) in a practical way (read: shouldn't take several days to simulate!) to make the design process manageable. Heterogeneous stacks on the other hand are seeing a good pace of development. There are several MPW's on the way that help researchers and product developers test their designs. The design challenge here using existing EDA tools is by no means a lesser challenge than the homogeneous stacks. Dr. MP Divakar

resistion
User Rank
Manager
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
resistion   8/26/2010 6:43:31 AM
NO RATINGS
Wonder if Mentor implemented multiple patterning at 16 nm.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
krisi   8/25/2010 2:08:19 PM
NO RATINGS
16nm? Sounds like very early. First is not always better for business in this case...plus how many companies can really do 16nm silicon processing? 3? 5? so any EDA development is really custom for a particular foundry considering large difference between them, at least initially until some equipment standardization happens...Kris

unknown multiplier
User Rank
Rookie
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
unknown multiplier   8/24/2010 4:12:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Are they going to cross-license with Tela Innovations?

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Rookie
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
double-o-nothing   8/24/2010 2:45:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Need to spread your net wide below 22 nm. Even 3-D is not a for sure thing. Trend extrapolation has its limit, that limit is about now. Double or even multiple patterning is the most natural choice for now, even if pushing Moore's law more slowly than before.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
goafrit   8/24/2010 1:07:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Let me congratulate Mentor Graphics. However, going down may not really be great business. In this race of nanometer devices, not being an early adopter could pay off better.



Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

MSGEQ7-Based DIY Audio Spectrum Analyzer: Testing
Max Maxfield
13 comments
In my previous column on this topic, we discussed the step-by-step construction of the first pass at a MSGEQ7-based DIY audio spectrum analyzer for use in my BADASS Display project. Of ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)