Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
re: IBM claims fastest MPU
elctrnx_lyf   9/4/2010 2:36:27 PM
NO RATINGS
The information provided in the article doesn't really show how good this processor is. Comparing the speed of execution with 1970 makes it really jeopardize to understand clear details. But definitely IBM put a lot of money into it and we just need to wait and see for more technical details regarding the processor and its performance. Is there any other processor with dense DRAM populated on the processor chip just like this. This is the one point sounds interesting ...

Kinnar
User Rank
CEO
re: IBM claims fastest MPU
Kinnar   9/3/2010 12:10:57 PM
NO RATINGS
I would love to see the performance and the benchmarking results of the server made up of using this processor, it would be giving remarkable performance provided OS is being able to take the power of the CPU.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: IBM claims fastest MPU
KB3001   9/3/2010 1:47:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Completely agree. I had the same reaction when I saw the 50 billion instructions per second figure. Actually, even the 50 billion instructions per second per processor is not that impressive by today's Intel microprocessor standards. Unless we see real benchmark results, we can't say much....

dirk.bruere
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM claims fastest MPU
dirk.bruere   9/2/2010 11:13:43 PM
NO RATINGS
I looked it up - the 50 billion does refer to a single processor, so 96 of them would be approx 5 trillion. I really hate that kind of useless comparison, which is almost as bad as tabloids measuring power by the number of cups of coffee that can be boiled by a given generator.

Code Monkey
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM claims fastest MPU
Code Monkey   9/2/2010 9:13:07 PM
NO RATINGS
That's 3 MIPs in 1970, but that's something that should be mentioned by a museum curator, not a news release. Maybe they mean 50 GIPS per processor.

dirk.bruere
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM claims fastest MPU
dirk.bruere   9/2/2010 8:29:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Is this a joke? "... capable of executing roughly 17,000 times more instructions per second than the most advanced system available in 1970, according to the company." and this: "...capable of 50 billion instructions per second, powered by 96 microprocessors..." The numbers are ludicrous.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: IBM claims fastest MPU
goafrit   9/2/2010 2:26:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Congrats IBM, they own this race. Hopefully, someone can give them a fight in the next decade. While fast is good, we also need intelligent MPUs that can do Jeopardy and help do my grocery for me.



EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Aging Brass: Cow Poop vs. Horse Doo-Doo
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
As you may recall, one of the things I want to do with the brass panels I'm using in my Inamorata Prognostication Engine is to make them look really old. Since everything is being mounted ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
11 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
11 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)