Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Patent office claims progress on backlog
krisi   9/11/2010 2:55:28 AM
NO RATINGS
One of the problems of the current patent system is that at least 90% (some might claim 99%) of the patents are useless. Despite what many say I actually think the patent fees should be increased, only then frivolous patent filing would stop. Anyone cares to comment? (I have been awarded 18 patents in several jurisdiction and worked with patent lawyers extensively)...Kris

antiquus
User Rank
Author
re: Patent office claims progress on backlog
antiquus   9/11/2010 12:05:44 AM
NO RATINGS
The patent office has become the poster child for "technical debt", which is the accumulated cost of not keeping up with your mounting process problems and outstanding bugs. Perhaps they should let the engineers at the post office have crack at the situation, before simply throwing money at the problem.

PatentGod
User Rank
Author
re: Patent office claims progress on backlog
PatentGod   9/9/2010 4:00:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Of the "in the hunt" remark about the expedited green tech patent application program, see http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2010/09/reality-check-needed-at-uspto.html

pixies
User Rank
Author
re: Patent office claims progress on backlog
pixies   9/9/2010 1:45:01 PM
NO RATINGS
The three-track system will not work because the main cost associated with a patent is the lawyer fee, not the application fee. Plus, the most talented examiner will inevitably leave and become or work for a patent attorney, leaving the Is there a way to "privatize" USPTO, so applicants and tax payer can both save money?

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Author
re: Patent office claims progress on backlog
Robotics Developer   9/8/2010 11:59:29 PM
NO RATINGS
I have been waiting for over a year for my patent application to be approved, reading this article it looks like at least a year of more is still needed before I can expect to hear anything! Wow! I can not imagine the work needed to check for existing patents against new claims, just the effort required to write up the application took me and a few lawyers 8 months. I look forward to the streamlining of the process that faster computers and more intelligent software would enable. What a great idea: faster computers, smarter software. Perhaps I should file a patent!

DrQuine
User Rank
Author
re: Patent office claims progress on backlog
DrQuine   9/8/2010 11:55:55 PM
NO RATINGS
The wildly differing proposals for patent reform suggest that reasonable people representing large and small businesses in different industries have differing interests (and probably explain why the process is gridlocked). In addition to providing more funding, Congress certainly should allow the patent office to keep all the funds it generates rather than siphoning some off through fee diversion. Do the examiners really have with obsolete computer systems? Certainly my laptop allows me excellent visibility into the patent office processes (public PAIR) and the full text issued / pending patent archives allow easy searches. Personally, I find the variations in processing time for patents in different subject matter areas to be most frustrating as an inventor - but completely understandable in terms of the challenge the patent office faces in finding qualified examiners.

phoenixdave
User Rank
Author
re: Patent office claims progress on backlog
phoenixdave   9/8/2010 11:02:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Upgrading their computer systems to make the examiners more efficient is where the money should be spend. Better hardware and software would lessen the reviewing and research process and provide a much more efficient operation.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Patent office claims progress on backlog
rick merritt   9/8/2010 9:38:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Have you seen any improvements in your dealings with the patent office in the past year?



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...