Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Code Monkey
User Rank
Rookie
re: Multicore processors: Now a movement
Code Monkey   3/1/2012 12:16:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Maybe there is too much anxiety over programming tools. The preemptive multitaskers used for years already provide most of the tools needed to organize apps into semi-autonomous threads. A little more work in that direction and a change in mindset among programmers will lead to apps that are equally at home running their threads across many processors or on a single processor.

vapats
User Rank
Rookie
re: Multicore processors: Now a movement
vapats   9/6/2011 9:07:06 PM
NO RATINGS
"very costly to write, and _debug_ the complex software". My experience has been the complete opposite, so I must caution against tarring all multicore app's with the same brush. Indeed, I have been on many projects where multiple CPUs made the job much easier; even without a performance problem, attempting to make one CPU do the whole job would have been a development nightmare! A divide-and-conquer approach to the design resulted in tremendous simplification, and the logistics of managing the coding team and build-coherence were streamlined and much more productive, rather than a version-control mess.

habib011
User Rank
Rookie
re: Multicore processors: Now a movement
habib011   2/11/2011 9:37:48 PM
NO RATINGS
hi my name is habib age is 22 years old i m from karachi pakistan i m pass 9th and spend my 10 years in computers and internet i m educated i m see lots of companys my email is mahabat09@aol.com i m working and job what should i do u tell me habib08911@yahoo.com

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Multicore processors: Now a movement
t.alex   10/6/2010 11:44:34 AM
NO RATINGS
It seems the hurdle to multicore is proper compiler and programming language. How can we write as simple code as possible and the compiler will distribute to the cores automatically?

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Multicore processors: Now a movement
KB3001   10/2/2010 9:37:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice article Tom. I was hoping for a similar scan of the software support landscape as well as the hardware one. Who are the main players for multicore processors' programmming support? Any contributions out there?

dougwithau
User Rank
Manager
re: Multicore processors: Now a movement
dougwithau   10/2/2010 8:35:59 PM
NO RATINGS
I attended the Multicore conference. There was some good information. http://concretemulticore.wordpress.com/2010/09/30/approching-multicore-conference-live-blog/ The chips have arrived, the software and tools have a way to go. There is no silver bullet tool that will allow legacy systems to move onto multicore. That seems to be what everyone is hoping for. I hope some new approaches will to the software will come from all this. I am tired of writing Linux drivers.

The MicroMan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Multicore processors: Now a movement
The MicroMan   10/1/2010 10:15:19 PM
NO RATINGS
There's a problem though. As discussed in the Approaching Multicore virtual conference, physics has gotten in the way and put a big speed bump into our comfortable continual increases of performance courtesy of the next semiconductor process node. Current leakage thru our tiny Xistors is burning us up. Something dramatic has to be done, and additional cores, sometimes identical, sometimes different/specific, are the only feasible way to circumvent the problem. Absolutely this is not easy and it dumps a load on the programmer like he hasn't seen before. But propellers will only take aircraft so fast, and at some point you have to realize that the P-51 has it's limits. It's time to come into the jet age. And for the time being, the hardware guys have the easy job. I hope this doesn't stall out our industry's great progress. At least now we've got masses of minds working on making the leap.

russpatterson
User Rank
Rookie
re: Multicore processors: Now a movement
russpatterson   10/1/2010 2:30:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Don't get too excited. After having worked through 3 multi-processors fads in my software career I'm not such a believer. Dedicated cpu's have a place for sure but hardware people seem to always think it's the answer to all their problems. The hitch is that it becomes very costly to write, and _debug_ the complex software that is needed to get the promised efficiency and usually a larger single core will be more cost effective for bringing a product to market. Fad 1, 1988 - the end of the mainframe era and the beginning of the workstation era. Multiprocessor architectrues were all the buzz but did not take off. Fad 2, 1994 - Gaming industry, Sega Saturn, 7 processors including two Hitachi SH2's. It turned out to be more effective to just put one in sleep mode to avoid bus contention (months of s/w engineering time went into that conclusion). Fad 3, 2008 - Playstation 3. Sony, Toshiba and IBM develop the Cell microprocessor. Although capable of lots of processing, for games it's no faster than the XBox 360 because firms don't invest the man-months of s/w engineering to figure out how to spread the problem over multiple cores.

Koda23
User Rank
Rookie
re: Multicore processors: Now a movement
Koda23   9/30/2010 6:24:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Multicore was a big part of this week's Linley Tech Processor Conference in San Jose, as well. One of the messages we got is that hardware accelerators for security, RegEx, compression, packet processing, and other functions are being integrated on-chip with multiple CPU cores. Speakers from Cavium, LSI, IBM/Power, Applied Micro, and Tilera presented their new multicore offerings, most of which are either MIPS64 or PPC based.

Adam Fullerton
User Rank
Rookie
re: Multicore processors: Now a movement
Adam Fullerton   9/29/2010 6:58:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Is this an advert for ARM?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Engineer's Bookshelf
Caleb Kraft

The Martian: A Delightful Exploration of Math, Mars & Feces
Caleb Kraft
3 comments
To say that Andy Weir's The Martian is an exploration of math, Mars, and feces is a slight simplification. I doubt that the author would have any complaints, though.

The Engineering Life - Around the Web
Caleb Kraft

Surprise TOQ Teardown at EELive!
Caleb Kraft
Post a comment
This year, for EELive! I had a little surprise that I was quite eager to share. Qualcomm had given us a TOQ smart watch in order to award someone a prize. We were given complete freedom to ...

Design Contests & Competitions
Caleb Kraft

Join The Balancing Act With April's Caption Contest
Caleb Kraft
56 comments
Sometimes it can feel like you're really performing in the big tent when presenting your hardware. This month's caption contest exemplifies this wonderfully.

Engineering Investigations
Caleb Kraft

Frankenstein's Fix: The Winners Announced!
Caleb Kraft
8 comments
The Frankenstein's Fix contest for the Tektronix Scope has finally officially come to an end. We had an incredibly amusing live chat earlier today to announce the winners. However, we ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)