Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
pixies
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. must fast-track policy on rare earth materials
pixies   9/30/2010 5:40:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Just issue fast-track visas to scientists and engineers specialized in rare-earth refinery technologies. The time frame could be cut down to less than 10 years.

DrQuine
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. must fast-track policy on rare earth materials
DrQuine   9/30/2010 6:24:21 PM
NO RATINGS
A related posting, http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/around-the-web/4208964/Pentagon-loses-control-of-bombs-to-China-metal-monopoly, expands upon this issue.

Baolt
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. must fast-track policy on rare earth materials
Baolt   9/30/2010 10:32:09 PM
NO RATINGS
I just want to ask Mr. President, how he is planning to overcome this huge problem indeed he is mentioning everywhere how important it is to focus on renewable energy and not paying huge amount of $s to middle east. Well it seems US will pay lots of $s to China, or IP costs to korea, japan, oh not forgetting has to bring back industrialization back to US with many jobs.

JLS
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. must fast-track policy on rare earth materials
JLS   9/30/2010 10:44:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Since it will take quite a few years to start getting to the point of producing these metals, the patents don't become an issue until they are being used. Sounds like we are already behind in getting started if they expire in 2014!

Baolt
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. must fast-track policy on rare earth materials
Baolt   9/30/2010 11:55:31 PM
NO RATINGS
unfortunately its unlikely possible. US, EU or let say world is so much addicted to cheap chinese work force, and moved almost everything to there. Now they have power of production and slowly resources. The alert time is already over, now we should focus on new tech. which wont require their involvement, and think over of globalization

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. must fast-track policy on rare earth materials
Sheetal.Pandey   10/1/2010 3:05:00 AM
NO RATINGS
I heard China is soon going to overtake in being strongest economy. May be this is one way.

Kaiser Silicon
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. must fast-track policy on rare earth materials
Kaiser Silicon   10/1/2010 1:49:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Wow. An export tariff. I haven't heard of that happening since the 19th century. Anybody still believe that the Chinese believe in free trade???

nicolas.mokhoff
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. must fast-track policy on rare earth materials
nicolas.mokhoff   10/1/2010 2:59:52 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd be curious to hear from electronics industry executives how not having a clear path to access rare earth elements might affect their business.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. must fast-track policy on rare earth materials
Robotics Developer   10/1/2010 6:28:46 PM
NO RATINGS
I just read an article here that talks about the the development of a non-rare earth magnet electric motor (http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4209004/Japan-researchers-develop-electric-motor-sans-rare-earth-metals). Perhaps the rest of the world should follow suit? It seems that we are being surprised by this development, but should we have been surprised? It makes both great business and political sense to control these high tech metals, why wouldn't we in the US (or any other country) not already be engaged in securing supplies? It makes me wonder....

nicolas.mokhoff
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. must fast-track policy on rare earth materials
nicolas.mokhoff   10/1/2010 8:02:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Our infatuation with low-cost labor allowed China to call the shots in rare earth metals used by the electronics industry. Both Japan and the U.S., as the world's most advanced economies, cannot afford to be cut off. So yes, while Japan is trying to find alternate solutions to using rare earth elements in their motors, the U.S. cannot afford to wait for this kind of development to see fruition. It needs to start opening the mines it closed earlier to catch up.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...