Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Saranyan
User Rank
Author
re: Survey shows SoC design data management is mission critical
Saranyan   10/28/2010 2:07:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi Shiv - thanks for the clarification. I agree with you that better IP management is a great focus area. Thanks for the article. -Saranyan

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: Survey shows SoC design data management is mission critical
old account Frank Eory   10/26/2010 10:49:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Great article Shiv. A good DM system is indeed essential in any IC development. Every chip involves thousands of files to manage, and members of the team spread all over the world. Long gone are the days when we could get by using CVS and a local repository. I'm interested in learning more about the integration of the bug tracking system with the DM system. In the past, those have always been separate, which costs extra time and can sometimes be error-prone. Thanks again for the article.

Shiv Sikand
User Rank
Author
re: Survey shows SoC design data management is mission critical
Shiv Sikand   10/25/2010 3:19:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi Saranyan, This survey was exclusively focused on Design Data Management challenges, so no, the responses were not mutually exclusive. As to obtaining a clear indication of an actual problem, we can measure its magnitude in two ways: On a relative scale, or an absolute one. We chose not to ask for a relative ranking of design management (DM) as compared to other design problems. Instead we obtained absolute measurements on the magnitude of the DM issue by quantifying its average impact on tapeout delay and designer overhead. With regard to considering design management separately, I agree they are intertwined with the design problems, as commercial design management systems can be deployed across all the tools in design and verification flows. In this case, our goal was to measure the relative rankings of the areas where engineers and their management felt Design Management systems would added the most value. We explicitly asked: "What are the 3 main reasons to use a Design Management system?" All the areas mentioned by respondents are important to design. However, there are unique problems with tracking bugs (e.g. through designs and derivatives) and team collaboration, for which the respondents indicated DM is especially well-suited, so these ranked currently at the top of their list. I personally see 'better IP and derivative reuse' as an area for which DM systems will be more broadly used over the next couple of years and is a strong focus now at IC Manage. -Shiv

Saranyan
User Rank
Author
re: Survey shows SoC design data management is mission critical
Saranyan   10/23/2010 2:03:22 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi Shiv, this is interesting data. I have some questions though. Are the responses mutually exclusive? Meaning, if somebody said design data management issues were the problem, did they feel the other things were OK? The reason I ask this question is that, I am curious about the focus point in your article. I don't think you can consider the design data management individually, which might be a byproduct of other problems (like bug tracking - 68%, team collaboration - 65%, easy access - 44%...). Also, one more question I had was whether this survey only focused on data management questions or were data management questions grouped together with other questions. If so, then it is a much clear indication of an actual problem. If all the questions were about data/design management, then it might be useful to understand what percentage of people in your sample feel data management is the biggest tapeout bottle neck, Thanks for the post; it was insightful. -Saranyan



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...