Intel is after Achronix not because of their asynchronous based FPGA, but future development on their product offerings. Intel will buy them to remain competitive because the product driven by asynchronous sequence is delay insensitive and will surely be the right roadmap to keep Moore's law going. This is Intel holding their future.
It will be very nice to have multiple Intel hard wired processor cores inside Achronix FPGA. Achronix and Intel will be able to provide Soc solution to mass consumer and industrial market. Desinger in embedded systems design will have significant advantage with this development. We eagerly await how soon they pur these new parts in market
Will Apple employ these new designs in their novel products?
a couple fine points:
Intel did have an ASIC operation built around the 8051 and the 82xx perphieral series back in the 80's.
Intel has also done silicon manufacturing for several companies in the past...just not well advertised:)
I think Intel missed a much bigger prize by only a month. They should have bought Actel instead, if their interest in FPGAs is genuine and long term. MicroSemi beat intel to it and scooped up Actel, quite cheaply I might add. No, MicroSemi does not compete with Intel, but this took Actel out of the market as a potential partner. So, Intel had to settle for a start-up, albeit a promising one.
This is interesting since at IDF they announced a deal with Altera to put an Atom and FPGA in the same package.
"The PC giant also announced Stellarton, a system-in-package that pairs an Altera FPGA with an Atom to enable reconfigurable systems."
I see a clear move towards Foundry Services. The China Fab was the first move in that direction. This announcement is the second. I guess Globalfoundries will encounter even more headwinds and TSMC beginning to see the ascend of a real competitor. Great move!
I don't think it is just about FPGAs. Achronix has important asynchronous logic IP that Intel could use in its chips so it could go clockless and thereby improve performance, but they'd have to learn about it and play with it. This would give them an opportunity to do so and overcome the "not invented here" syndrome that may exist amongst its own designers. Designers have shied away from using Asynchronous Logic even though the theory and methodology have been available now for some time; but Achronix has provided a trojan horse by which designers can be tempted to use the technology, the improved throughput being a big incentive.
Indeed Industry is finding growing co-importance of Processors and FPGAs for future. And both FPGA vendors and Processor vendors are getting in to it. FPGAs jumped before with hard ARM and now Intel is investigating other way around (perhaps soon we see some stuff from AMD too in that direction). I agree with you Dylan and resistion. Intel is testing different ideas. Few weeks back we saw the Stellarton SIP with Altera, now a more direct sign with Achronix.
More info on this: Earlier today I was told that Achronix laid off most of its sales force about a month ago. I spoke to Achronix about this and John Lofton Holt was very clear that Intel is a manufacturing partner only and will not be doing any sales or marketing of Achronix products as a condition of this agreement. Holt also said that within the past 45 days Achronix did lay off several sales people. The reason Holt gave is that the company had been preparing to start selling 28-nm parts in the near future (and was staffing up for it). But when the Intel deal came through, Achronix scrapped 28-nm altogether and instead is preparing to be selling 22-nm parts in about a year. Essentially, they don't need all of those sales people right now because they won't have their new products in the original timeframe. Makes sense to me.
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.