Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
chanj0   11/9/2010 5:23:54 PM
Up to 4GB RAM may be a limitation to support multiple VMs with sophisticated service. The power saving may come down to how many VMs that can be supported on a ARM based server vs that can be supported by a x86 based server.

User Rank
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
bobbytsai   11/9/2010 5:18:16 PM
here are a few more publicly announced Cortex-A licenses: Broadcom , NEC Electronics, NVIDIA, STM, Toshiba, Mindspeed Technologies, Freescale, Matsushita, Samsung, PMC-Sierra, Ziilabs. Why are there no solutions like Tilera's 36 or 64 core products. Are ARM's per core licensing costs too high ? 32 bit address limitations ? There are a lot of multi-core non ARM product our there, Cavium Networks (MIPS), Netlogic (MIPS), Freescale (PPC), Azul (Java VM), Plurality ...

User Rank
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
pica0   11/9/2010 8:47:10 AM
2 or even 4GB of RAM is sufficiant for many, many server tasks. I think a system based on that SoC is on par with the Pentium III Tualatin quad-processor systems build in 2001-2002. These system also had just 2 or 4 GB of RAM. But nevertheless served well.

User Rank
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
neuraxon77   11/9/2010 5:03:33 AM
Typo: 800 MHz not 8090 MHz. It's also ECC.

User Rank
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
DF0   11/9/2010 4:50:56 AM
Definitely interesting, but it seems problematic that you have four cores that can address only a total of 4GB of memory, e.g. 1GB per core. Might be limiting for a lot of server apps. In practice it might be worse, with the system only able to handle 2-3GB (that's been my experience with 32-bit, non-PAE Linux).

rick merritt
User Rank
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
rick merritt   11/8/2010 9:45:49 PM
If you are doing something to push ARM into low power servers I'd love to hear about it.

IoT Network Shoot Out
July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday

Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.

Brought to you by

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.