Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
chanj0   11/9/2010 5:23:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Up to 4GB RAM may be a limitation to support multiple VMs with sophisticated service. The power saving may come down to how many VMs that can be supported on a ARM based server vs that can be supported by a x86 based server.

bobbytsai
User Rank
Rookie
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
bobbytsai   11/9/2010 5:18:16 PM
NO RATINGS
here are a few more publicly announced Cortex-A licenses: Broadcom , NEC Electronics, NVIDIA, STM, Toshiba, Mindspeed Technologies, Freescale, Matsushita, Samsung, PMC-Sierra, Ziilabs. Why are there no solutions like Tilera's 36 or 64 core products. Are ARM's per core licensing costs too high ? 32 bit address limitations ? There are a lot of multi-core non ARM product our there, Cavium Networks (MIPS), Netlogic (MIPS), Freescale (PPC), Azul (Java VM), Plurality ...

pica0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
pica0   11/9/2010 8:47:10 AM
NO RATINGS
2 or even 4GB of RAM is sufficiant for many, many server tasks. I think a system based on that SoC is on par with the Pentium III Tualatin quad-processor systems build in 2001-2002. These system also had just 2 or 4 GB of RAM. But nevertheless served well.

neuraxon77
User Rank
Rookie
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
neuraxon77   11/9/2010 5:03:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Typo: 800 MHz not 8090 MHz. It's also ECC.

DF0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
DF0   11/9/2010 4:50:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Definitely interesting, but it seems problematic that you have four cores that can address only a total of 4GB of memory, e.g. 1GB per core. Might be limiting for a lot of server apps. In practice it might be worse, with the system only able to handle 2-3GB (that's been my experience with 32-bit, non-PAE Linux).

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Marvell quad-core ARM targets x86 servers
rick merritt   11/8/2010 9:45:49 PM
NO RATINGS
If you are doing something to push ARM into low power servers I'd love to hear about it.



EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Feast Your Orbs on My Jiggly Exercise Machine
Max Maxfield
49 comments
Last weekend, I was chatting with my mother on the phone. She's all excited that I'm coming over to visit for a week in November. "I'll be seeing you in only seven weeks," she trilled ...

Glen Chenier

Missing Datasheet Details Can Cause Problems
Glen Chenier
3 comments
It is often said that "the devil is in the details." All too often those details are hidden deep within a datasheet, where you can easily overlook them. When a datasheet reference circuit ...

David Blaza

RadioShack: The End Is Nigh!
David Blaza
121 comments
I'm feeling a little nostalgic today as I read about what looks like the imminent demise of RadioShack, at least as we currently know it. An old ubiquitous cartoon image popped into my ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)