Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
jhchang
User Rank
Rookie
re: University of New Mexico sues Intel
jhchang   12/1/2010 12:46:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Hail the patent trolls!

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
re: University of New Mexico sues Intel
Sheetal.Pandey   11/22/2010 4:18:49 AM
NO RATINGS
Its good to protect the right of inventor of the technology. Its great to see that in US copyright acts are so strict.

eng237
User Rank
Rookie
re: University of New Mexico sues Intel
eng237   11/19/2010 5:16:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Correct. UNM's patent claims the use of two resist coatings (which is part of some DP schemes) but with interferometric exposures (which is definitely not part of DP). Two exposures and two etches is becoming quite common, but is not new. Pitch reduction DP (the objective of US6042998) is practiced with single exposure and Dep/Etch, not infringing on US6042998.

eng237
User Rank
Rookie
re: University of New Mexico sues Intel
eng237   11/19/2010 5:00:21 PM
NO RATINGS
The lawyers don't interpret. They hand the patent to tech's and say "are we using this invention?" Then, it is a business decision ($$$).

rosekcmr
User Rank
Rookie
re: University of New Mexico sues Intel
rosekcmr   11/17/2010 5:20:00 PM
NO RATINGS
@Etmax - You are exactly correct; scrap the patent system. Just think of all the wasted money and resources with these stupid legal battles. No wonder the US can't be competitive anymore!

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: University of New Mexico sues Intel
resistion   11/17/2010 4:29:38 AM
NO RATINGS
Prior art search is actually quite difficult to be thorough and requires time-consuming practice to become more efficient. Since the inventor in general is pretty familiar with this technology, he/she can find the stuff pretty quick and then pass it along to the lawyers for discussion of what to do. But I am more surprised by how come the USPTO didn't screen inventions better. I can only guess they are not as well trained in the relevant arts. After some more digging, I found US5424154 was already years ahead of this UNM patent, while essentially doing the same thing.

Etmax
User Rank
Rookie
re: University of New Mexico sues Intel
Etmax   11/17/2010 3:44:48 AM
NO RATINGS
If two companies develop the same idea in secrecy at a similar time, I would have thought that made the idea obvious to someone trained in the art. Also this one sounds like something they never did in the past (pre 32nm) because it wasn't necessary to think about it. The idea of using interference patterns to deduce detail is almost as old as laser interferometry. It's used in the X-ray spectrum as well (in reverse) for imaging atomic sized particles. It's a bit like making drawing current from a battery a different patent than charging a battery. The more I see what's happening in the patent world the more I think they should scrap patents altogether and have science advance at the rate it did before patent trolls. It's either that or put some real tests in place for patents. 1. Not obvious to someone in the field. 2. Not a direct replication of nature. 3. Not a logical extension of something existing. 4. Must be a device, not a business process or piece of SW. Item 1 is already part of patent legislation, but no one seems to care??

Etmax
User Rank
Rookie
re: University of New Mexico sues Intel
Etmax   11/17/2010 3:37:37 AM
NO RATINGS
So what do the lawyers get paid for? Chasing up prior art I thought was one of them. Also what ever happened to the need for patents to not be obvious to someone trained in the art?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: University of New Mexico sues Intel
resistion   11/17/2010 1:49:20 AM
NO RATINGS
US6042998 applies to a combination of at least two photoresist-defined patterns in different photoresist layers coated at different times. I don't think that is currently practiced as currently targeted double patterning, but you never know in the future. That said, UNM is showing bad form almost as a patent troll, and has no case against prior art, e.g., US5827761. Companies licensing from such as UNM must be too busy to check prior art. Engineers must learn to do this, can't just rely on lawyers.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: University of New Mexico sues Intel
mcgrathdylan   11/16/2010 7:09:06 PM
NO RATINGS
@Kiran_NSN--I don't know the definitive answer to your question. But I would think UNM would have had to have tried to discuss this with Intel prior to filing a lawsuit. It seems like filing the suit as the opening move would be the wrong way to approach it, in my opinion. Obviously they didn't get the response they wanted from Intel, and perhaps they had trouble even getting Intel's attention or cooperation.

Page 1 / 4   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Fist Bumps & the Zombie Apocalypse
Max Maxfield
26 comments
Are you concerned about the possibility of a Zombie Apocalypse or do you scoff at the thought of such an eventuality? If the latter, would you be surprised to hear that the US military has ...

Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer

Future Engineers: Don’t 'Trip Up' on Your College Road Trip
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer
8 comments
A future engineer shares his impressions of a recent tour of top schools and offers advice on making the most of the time-honored tradition of the college road trip.

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
41 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Karen Field

July Cartoon Caption Contest: Let's Talk Some Trash
Karen Field
151 comments
Steve Jobs allegedly got his start by dumpster diving with the Computer Club at Homestead High in the early 1970s.

Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)