As I understand the concept of entanglement, the selection of a possible common historical base within the computation could eliminate a very large amount of thereby discovered and thus unnecessary computational involvement.
Terry, an excellent elaboration but it's still very difficult to understand how entanglment could be used in the real world to process data at a faster rate. How can customization of functions dynamically be faster than having dedicated hardware lying in wait for data to be processed?
I agree. The timing and execution will have to be expertly executed. This technology reminds me of the cancer treatment that works on DNA structure, but is not able (at this time) to be administered to patients. I hope scientists and technology professionals will continue to work on both types of tech to find solutions that deliver significant results (and cures).
I was reminded of fuzzy logic when I read this article. Is there any family history connecting the chaosgates and fuzzy logic? I also remembered using and "programing" analog computers while in college, it was really fun back then with all the patchcords. I am wondering now the control for the gates works in this device, what drives it to change and what maintains its "state"?
This reminds me of the line by Jane Goodall that follows:
"There isn't a sharp line dividing humans from the rest of the animal kingdom. It's a very wuzzie line, and it's getting wuzzier all the time"
So how is "wuzzie" different from "fuzzy"?
As we unveil EE Times’ 2015 Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. Panelists Dan Armbrust (investment firm Silicon Catalyst), Andrew Kau (venture capital firm Walden International), and Stan Boland (successful serial entrepreneur, former CEO of Neul, Icera) join in the live debate.