Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
re: IBM debuts CMOS silicon nanophotonics
R_Colin_Johnson   12/13/2010 5:11:40 PM
NO RATINGS
For a direct bandgap material, like III-V, an electron near the bottom of the conduction band can recombine with a hole is near the top of the valence band, annihilating the electron and releasing its energy as a photon. Unfortunately, in an indirect band gap material such a process would violate the conservation of crystal momentum.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
re: IBM debuts CMOS silicon nanophotonics
R_Colin_Johnson   12/13/2010 4:49:05 PM
NO RATINGS
That, of course, is one of the issues that IBM engineers are working on as we speak. And you can bet IBM is also working on process/material/archtectural innovations to overcome the hurdles to silicon emitters.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: IBM debuts CMOS silicon nanophotonics
krisi   12/13/2010 3:38:36 PM
NO RATINGS
thank you Colin...this approach seems to be much more practical...but clearly some issues remain, how do you synchronize off chip III-V laser signals with some on chip CMOS generated signals? Kris

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
re: IBM debuts CMOS silicon nanophotonics
R_Colin_Johnson   12/12/2010 7:31:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, Intel has successfully grafted a flake of III-V onto a silicon chip as an emitter, but not in a production environment. I believe that instead of fabricating III-V materials on CMOS chips, that instead IBM is figuring on using a traditional discrete III-V emitter and just piping its emissions onto its CISN chips with fiber optics, where the silicon modulators will take over translating electrical data into optical data.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
re: IBM debuts CMOS silicon nanophotonics
R_Colin_Johnson   12/12/2010 7:23:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Good emitters need to have a direct bandgap so that electrons in the conduction band can annihilate a hole in the valence band, thereby releasing the excess energy as a photon. Silicon has an indirect bandgap that prevents it from being a good emitter.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: IBM debuts CMOS silicon nanophotonics
krisi   12/11/2010 12:12:08 AM
NO RATINGS
No, silicon has indirect bandgap, that is the whole problem...you really have to twist its bonds to produce coherent light...regardless of the wavelength...Kris

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
re: IBM debuts CMOS silicon nanophotonics
R_Colin_Johnson   12/10/2010 11:58:07 PM
NO RATINGS
I thought of this idea of using air-gaps as waveguides when I was interviewing IBM, but then forgot to ask about it. My best guess is that the people working on air-gaps are not in the same huddle as the guys working on silicon photonics. Maybe when both technologies are a little more mature, there will be some cross-fertilization.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
re: IBM debuts CMOS silicon nanophotonics
R_Colin_Johnson   12/10/2010 11:52:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel has many of the components for silicon photonics, including a hybrid emitter that uses a III-V flake, but IBM claims it is the only vendor that has downsized its photonic components enough to make them commercially feasible.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: IBM debuts CMOS silicon nanophotonics
krisi   12/10/2010 11:50:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Thank you Colin. Yes, silicon emitter would have poor performance, carbon nanotube based or else (BTW, carbon nanotube laser sounds like a long shot)...and III-V laser would be lower cost, but only if manufactured in III-V process...I think it will be very expensive if manufactured in silicon process, imagine how many process steps will be require to add that laser, enormous complexity, hardly a manufacturable solution! Kris

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
re: IBM debuts CMOS silicon nanophotonics
R_Colin_Johnson   12/10/2010 11:45:12 PM
NO RATINGS
IBM has a silicon emitter, but it is a hybrid that uses a carbon nanotube: htp://bit.ly/eHrLjj However when I asked IBM about it, they said cost-wise no silicon emitter could yet compete with III-V emitters in performance or cost, and until they do no one should switch.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
nlenz
 
wilber_xbox
 
wilber_xbox
 
prabhakar_deosthali
 
wilber_xbox
 
Kinnar
 
Kinnar
 
nlenz
 
Kinnar
Most Recent Messages
11/27/2014
5:40:28 AM
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
10 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).