Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
DAVID.DESHARNAIS_#1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Whither interoperability? The myth of the grand, unifying EDA database
DAVID.DESHARNAIS_#1   12/9/2010 9:04:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Richard Goering gives "inside" scoop: http://bit.ly/gJZb5f

dhrods
User Rank
Rookie
re: Whither interoperability? The myth of the grand, unifying EDA database
dhrods   12/9/2010 7:52:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Linda makes some great observations about the practical realities of Silicon Realization—I think we all agree on the problem although I think there are some misconceptions about the OpenAccess program and progress to date. Cadence believes strongly that a common database is important to the industry and has remained steadfastly committed for the past eight years. Since 2002, Cadence has contributed and maintained more than 90 engineer-years of code at our own expense. We actively participate in the community and provide input to architectural and priority decisions. The community owns OA content. Cadence has no IP rights other than those granted to us by the community. The community leadership is comprised of other major EDA players as well as heavyweight product companies. Cadence works in this community for the good of the industry which in turn benefits Cadence. The community is releasing 22.41, due by the end of 2010, which supports multi-threading. The community has recently released new scripting language bindings for Tcl, Python, and Ruby which are available for beta now. The binding code is designed to be easy for the community to download and support. There are many companies both on the EDA side and the design side that depend on OA every day. These companies are all very well aware of the continued improvements in database capability. The community sees this through the evidence of continued and accelerating adoption. OA was never envisioned to optimally support every algorithm known to EDA. OA’s primary goal is interoperability. There are some applications that will work well with an in-memory model and some that don’t. The point is to have a common place to store and access design data so it can be shared across applications and design teams. OA delivers a common repository to store data and access it either through C++ APIs or various scripting languages built on top of OA…a huge improvement compared to what the industry has had in the past.

John McGehee
User Rank
Rookie
re: Whither interoperability? The myth of the grand, unifying EDA database
John McGehee   12/9/2010 5:07:07 PM
NO RATINGS
And as those who attended the OpenAccess Conference in October know, Cadence has started to add multithreading support to OpenAccess. http://si2.org/?page=1282

John McGehee
User Rank
Rookie
re: Whither interoperability? The myth of the grand, unifying EDA database
John McGehee   12/9/2010 4:45:12 PM
NO RATINGS
The OpenAccess Coalition Scripting Languages Working Group has Perl, Python, Ruby and Tcl ready for action: http://www.pr-inside.com/new-contributions-ease-adoption-of-r2298621.htm Synopsys did the Tcl binding. I might do C#. Which scripting language did Mentor want? I have made two code contributions to OpenAccess. It's possible but difficult because only Cadence is allowed to change the core database code. To get even a production tested bug fix into OpenAccess, it took well over a year plus pressure from a powerful OpenAccess Coalition member. Magma seems to have done okay with a central database strategy.

Neo10
User Rank
Rookie
re: Whither interoperability? The myth of the grand, unifying EDA database
Neo10   12/7/2010 4:46:55 AM
NO RATINGS
While most agree that OA has failed in universal acceptance it still has the potential to be leveraged as an Open database standard. In part it depends on Cadence relinquishing some of it's IP rights and others taking up OA and adding to it to make it really unified. Or left to itself the industry will gravitate towards two or three camps of database technologies and face insurmountable problems in the long run. For a start the top EDA companies should come together and come out with some kind of a compromise and hand it over to Accellera or another such independent entity to take it forward.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

MSGEQ7-Based DIY Audio Spectrum Analyzer: Testing
Max Maxfield
13 comments
In my previous column on this topic, we discussed the step-by-step construction of the first pass at a MSGEQ7-based DIY audio spectrum analyzer for use in my BADASS Display project. Of ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)