Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
re: Update: Intel confirms 450-mm fab plans
wilber_xbox   12/24/2010 1:01:03 AM
NO RATINGS
i somehow missed this report. This is really something which was more like a rumor to save cost at 20x and 10x nodes.

Baolt
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Intel confirms 450-mm fab plans
Baolt   12/24/2010 12:41:18 AM
NO RATINGS
As expected its on now, and not the nikon is the supplier for the fabtool. Its kind of combination from applied, asml and nikon last. As nikon had serious problems with extreme litho its was the reason why intel initially announced different than expected. No matter who says what, as the leader is in, every other big guy will follow him, so 450 is in place. However i dont think we could see 450 with sub-14nm as litho gets mad, and materials goes crazy. I wonder when 3D chip sets will be in place.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Update: Intel confirms 450-mm fab plans
resistion   12/11/2010 5:57:15 PM
NO RATINGS
450 mm and sub-10 nm node are appropriately relegated to unimaginable future.

Bruzzer
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Update: Intel confirms 450-mm fab plans
Bruzzer   12/11/2010 6:01:19 AM
NO RATINGS
On collaboration to cut design and manufacturing costs certainly. On economics, Moore’s objective has presented an issue sub micron and all the time. Should industry double transistor density every 18 to 24 months on a pressed lithography schedule’s economics? Acknowledging Rock’s insight of doubling investment dollars each process generation has die economics become a fallacy? Where Intel has raced lithography inorganically how many nodes ahead to achieve its own process gains and too who’s benefit? When producing sequential short runs of surplus offer’s no economic profit too pay for this inefficiency over the long run? Too support producers or enablers of these subordinate economic effects? And now on trailing edge of CMOS average cost curve should development dollars be invested toward deflationary production scenarios on inflationary cost structures? Does 300mm+ acknowledge transition from industrial commercial art back towards applied science? Too bridge across a monopoly divide in development dollars toward all of our molecular futures? Meaning lithography, materials and etch but not harvesting on larger wafers. A monopoly aim whose time has past? Where competitors in this race have recognized their math error? Finally, IDM and end markets should pay more for this leading performance hardware enablement not less. Mike Bruzzone, Camp Marketing Consultancy

geekmaster
User Rank
CEO
re: Update: Intel confirms 450-mm fab plans
geekmaster   12/10/2010 11:53:55 PM
NO RATINGS
I do not think we will be using Poly-Si after 450mm.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: Update: Intel confirms 450-mm fab plans
mcgrathdylan   12/10/2010 6:33:54 PM
NO RATINGS
PS- I was being facetious above. It sounds like there has been more progress on 450-mm than I realized. I'm still not convinced that 450 will be in production anytime soon, or that it will ever have mass appeal, even for the handful of companies that can afford it. But time will tell.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: Update: Intel confirms 450-mm fab plans
mcgrathdylan   12/10/2010 6:30:19 PM
NO RATINGS
I think the industry should start development of 725-mm.....

yalanand
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Intel confirms 450-mm fab plans
yalanand   12/10/2010 4:56:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice blog Daniel, Very informative. your dogs look scary :).

yalanand
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Intel confirms 450-mm fab plans
yalanand   12/10/2010 4:47:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Ok so finally 450mm is here, any guesses what next ?

mlvlvr
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Intel confirms 450-mm fab plans
mlvlvr   12/9/2010 11:32:27 PM
NO RATINGS
more time passed between 300mm and whatevercomesnextmm, than between any two wafer size introductions in history. That's because it was so good at what it sought to do; reduce chip cost. Along the way, we also cut global warming gases per chip and made many other improvements.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
Susan Rambo
 
y88games
 
Kinnar
 
y88games
 
AZskibum
 
AZskibum
 
AZskibum
 
sixscrews
 
collin0
Most Recent Messages
8/29/2014
5:26:13 AM
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Aging Brass: Cow Poop vs. Horse Doo-Doo
Max Maxfield
34 comments
As you may recall, one of the things I want to do with the brass panels I'm using in my Inamorata Prognostication Engine is to make them look really old. Since everything is being mounted ...

latest comment y88games Thank you so much for sharing.
EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
11 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
11 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)