Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Baolt
User Rank
Author
re: My Windows roadmap for tablets and more
Baolt   12/23/2010 11:49:20 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree that MS is hungry-bat for license fee, on the other hand dont agree that Free software is the key. What about Apple than? they dont ask for license cost however they dont allow you to play with other rules. The way that MS could win from the pad market is that they make serious partnership with computer producers as like Dell, Asus, Acer etc with low cost license and ARM support. On the other hand we are talking about WIntel cooperation. I dont think in short term we could see ARM based MS systems

dirk.bruere
User Rank
Author
re: My Windows roadmap for tablets and more
dirk.bruere   12/23/2010 10:59:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Good point Larry. In fact, maybe industrial control panels will disappear into tablets. Just boxes and tablets...

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
re: My Windows roadmap for tablets and more
LarryM99   12/23/2010 10:07:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Extend your definition of remote controls into industrial control panels and other similar applications and I would tend to agree with you. Larry M.

dirk.bruere
User Rank
Author
re: My Windows roadmap for tablets and more
dirk.bruere   12/23/2010 9:49:43 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't see tablets being "productivity tools", but a new class of machines. My company, for example, will be using tablets as super remote controls to be supplied with our AV systems. I think they will mainly be entertainment devices.

goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: My Windows roadmap for tablets and more
goafrit   12/23/2010 9:09:09 PM
NO RATINGS
It is not the technology it is the cost. Android is free and you cannot sell Windows and hardware and expect profit. Window tablets are expensive because of the OS fees. That is the problem

Duane Benson
User Rank
Author
re: My Windows roadmap for tablets and more
Duane Benson   12/23/2010 6:32:25 PM
NO RATINGS
I disagree with the premise that Microsoft Office is not a requirement for broad adoption of a Windows tablet OS. Regardless of any amount or lack of suitability, Windows is used by the masses and the masses need transparent interoperability. People have enough trouble just managing file location and duplication with multiple devices. Add in format differences between a tablet and a full-PC and the problem will on be much worse. If tablets become inexpensive enough to be single use devices (web browsing only, entertainment only, etc) then, perhaps it would work without office application compatibility, but as anything close to a replacement for a netbook/notebook or as any kind of a productivity tool, it just won't fly without it.

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
re: My Windows roadmap for tablets and more
LarryM99   12/23/2010 5:46:28 PM
NO RATINGS
What CPU they are running on is the least of Microsoft's concerns in terms of tablets. Their knee-jerk reaction is to impose the Windows heavy client model on them, which is far from optimum. This was their mistake in the first round of tablets a decade ago. Making it into a big phone isn't quite right either, as is being discovered with the current generation of tablets. CES this year will be the first chance to see Google's take on a real tablet operating system and user model. There is a door still open here for Microsoft, but it may be closing fast. Larry M.

Dave.Dykstra
User Rank
Author
re: My Windows roadmap for tablets and more
Dave.Dykstra   12/23/2010 3:32:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Since companies have been looking at ARMs for several years (and developing a number of products, not just tablets, on that platform), one wonders where Windows has been and if they can catch up.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: My Windows roadmap for tablets and more
old account Frank Eory   12/22/2010 11:01:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps Windows for Tablets should evolve from Windows Phone rather than from Windows 7. It should, of course, run on ARMs as well as Atoms. One must wonder though if MS isn't too late to the tablet party to make a difference.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...