Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
dirk.bruere
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore's Law could enter the fourth dimension--via the third
dirk.bruere   12/23/2010 10:57:28 PM
NO RATINGS
The generalized Moore's Law is really about processing power. I believe it is essential to keep pushing up processing power exponentially. Every order of magnitude increase brings new s/w capabilities into play. I started work when the Cray 1 supercomputer was king, at $10m (back when that was a lot of money). Now an iPhone would thrash it. That's the progress I want to continue.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Moore's Law could enter the fourth dimension--via the third
krisi   12/23/2010 10:43:32 PM
NO RATINGS
I wish people would just stop talking about Moore's Law. I have been hearing about it all my professional life (and I am not that young) and most of it is just too repetitive. And it is not even a law! (I am OK with Ohm's law) but a business observation. Finally, it no longer works. Can we talk about something else? Like 3D interconnects that improve performance. Without to resorting to the old Moore's Law pls. Just accept that microprocessors speeds do not increase anymore...Kris

Zeev00
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore's Law could enter the fourth dimension--via the third
Zeev00   12/23/2010 10:43:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually, what killed wafer-scale integration is yield. And that's one of the main reasons it is still dead. Going into 3D opens up interesting new options to deal with yield issues but, in any case, 3D monolithic stacking inherently reduces the chip net area because of reduced average wire length and need of repeaters. So it will tend to help yield assuming similar defect rates.

dirk.bruere
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore's Law could enter the fourth dimension--via the third
dirk.bruere   12/23/2010 9:45:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, let's say Moore's Law stopped around 1985. You still say that s/w innovation would not have been severely impacted?

dirk.bruere
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore's Law could enter the fourth dimension--via the third
dirk.bruere   12/23/2010 8:55:02 PM
NO RATINGS
We are factors of billions, if not trillions, away from theoretical physical limits. The rest is merely engineering:-) However, if Moore's Law were to stop so would much of the s/w industry innovations. We are just getting to the point where natural language understanding is possible - but only on supercomputers. We need the Law to continue for the next 20 years to make that economical for everyone. As for 3D etc, whatever happened to wafer scale computing? It sounds a lot easier than 3D.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: Moore's Law could enter the fourth dimension--via the third
Duane Benson   12/23/2010 6:23:53 PM
NO RATINGS
If Moore's law has followed the exponential growth indicated by the law of accelerating returns, we shouldn't assume and depend on advancement continuing at that pace forever. At some point, the curve reverses and we end up moving to a point of diminishing returns. (until the next game-changing breakthrough) It's already happening if you consider clock speed. Until recently, clock speeds were increasing as fast as anything else described by Moore's law, but they have essentially leveled out. It happened with aircraft speed, with automobile horse power and it will happen with chip density and all other aspects of semiconductors. At that point, we'll have to adapt to a world of incremental improvements rather than one of constant dramatic improvement.

Sanjib.A
User Rank
CEO
re: Moore's Law could enter the fourth dimension--via the third
Sanjib.A   12/23/2010 6:19:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting article! Is this topic still in research? Is there any of the chip manufacturers actively working towards commercially deploying this technology?

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
re: Moore's Law could enter the fourth dimension--via the third
LarryM99   12/23/2010 6:08:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Moore's Law is a business visualization tool, not a business plan in and of itself. It was relevant when more computing power was significant to users, but that is not really the case any more. The chip industry has got to figure out what is important to users for the next decade rather than blindly following linear thinking (even linear thinking along an exponential curve). 3D stacking is a good tool, but you have to do something useful with it. Larry M.

<<   <   Page 3 / 3


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

The Best of the Best Videos on YouTube
Max Maxfield
2 comments
A couple of days ago, my chum Paul was visiting me in my office. He'd wandered over from his cubicle in the next bay to take a brief coffee break. This week, Paul had been admiring the ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...