Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
any1
User Rank
Author
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
any1   1/27/2011 10:24:06 PM
NO RATINGS
One of the major reasons that nanoimprint and maskless lithography are behind EUV is that early in the development of next generation lithography tools Intel and a few other large companies made sure that most of the resources were funneled to EUV. Nanoimprint and maskless technologies were ignored and starved. Over the last several years there has been so much money and effort thrown at EUV tool and process development that it has become "too big to fail".

mark.lapedus
User Rank
Author
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
mark.lapedus   1/24/2011 7:59:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Any more comments Bruzzer? I am interested

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
KB3001   1/22/2011 12:25:21 AM
NO RATINGS
Quite right. It's happening in a way already, but harsh economics will accelerate the trend.

sdb
User Rank
Author
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
sdb   1/22/2011 12:05:30 AM
NO RATINGS
Bruzzer - it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." Macbeth (Act V, Scene V).

mark.lapedus
User Rank
Author
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
mark.lapedus   1/20/2011 4:43:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi. I talked to DNP this week. They say the MII is an R&D system. I will follow up. thanks

scummings55
User Rank
Author
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
scummings55   1/20/2011 4:20:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Earlier this month DNP announced the purchase of a semiconductor 6025 mask replication tool from Molecular Imprints that uses nanoimprint lithography, making good on the article you wrote in July 2009 (http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4083666/DNP-MII-devise-nano-imprint-mask-technology). They say NIL is progressing to pilot production for semi. Why not follow up and get the latest news from these folks?

atifh1
User Rank
Author
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
atifh1   1/20/2011 5:08:29 AM
NO RATINGS
intel bashing in gibberish?

Bruzzer
User Rank
Author
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
Bruzzer   1/20/2011 3:56:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel is responsible for fabrication equipment industry consolidation to maintain their own process, fabrication, microprocessor and intra platform computing monopolies. In an environment where Intel has destroyed competitors and concentrated their own dealing cartel by racing process destructively. That is at a pace in excess of product organic market efficiencies for nearly two decades. Honest, Intel has never supported the expansion of subordinate economic potentials other than their own. When Moore’s law is an axiom misrepresented to conceal Rock’s enterprise monopoly objective. Where Intel plans in advance the concentration of compliment’s into their Dark hole. In an environment where Intel leads too productize subsequent process regimes, only to move so rapidly to the next, that the prior is prevented organic commercialization. Promoting the very inefficiencies that limit economic profit due fabrication equipment and material design manufacturer’s for reinvestment into a sustainable development practice. Really, today, why doesn’t an Intel microscope kit for young adults come equipped with a barrel etcher and 20 2 inch wafers to fabricate a radio, media player and memory stick? That answer is fabrication process regime never freed from Intel monopoly restraints. And now, at 450 millimeter, under Intel control invites the catalyst for a destructive accelerant. By an executive team that cannot demonstrate management antitrust compliance to free industry from the many form of Intel industrial slave society. Where everyone knows Intel’s objective is to bar others from crossing a very narrow bridge into the new world of molecular electronics. Mike Bruzzone, Camp Marketing Consultancy.

mark.lapedus
User Rank
Author
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
mark.lapedus   1/20/2011 1:51:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Nano-imprint and maskless are behind EUV. We have covered these topics extensively. Nano-imprint is not ready for prime time in semis. Not sure it will ever work for semis. Maskless or ML2 is still science fiction.

scummings55
User Rank
Author
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
scummings55   1/19/2011 11:09:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Given the challenges, uncertainty and expense still to come for EUV, I do not understand why other next-gen technologies are not mentioned in such a discussion. What is the status of nanoimprint lithography and maskless writing? Simple economics says $125M/tool is not a plausible solution.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...