Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Kinnar
User Rank
Author
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
Kinnar   2/14/2011 8:09:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Advancements in the Base Station chip-sets is extremely required to be the maximum efficiency out of it, but simultaneously it is also required that the BTS will support all previous and future technologies and standards, by one or another way, otherwise it will be very difficulty situation in a country like India where the service provider will be having their presence thought the country.

Davide Barra
User Rank
Author
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
Davide Barra   2/14/2011 4:44:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Our Company is pleased for being mentioned upon the collaboration with Texas Instruments and would like to highlight that the correct name is Azcom Technology and not Axcom, as reported in the article herein. For further details, please go at http://www.azcom.it.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
KB3001   2/14/2011 7:13:50 PM
NO RATINGS
I wonder what FPGA companies such as Xilinx and Altera have to say about this two-horse race? Any comments out there?

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
junko.yoshida   2/14/2011 9:14:45 PM
NO RATINGS
I do apologize for my misspelling. It's my bad. Sorry!

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
old account Frank Eory   2/14/2011 11:22:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Why would they have anything to say about it? Making a "base station on a chip" is way outside of their core businesses.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
junko.yoshida   2/15/2011 1:29:56 AM
NO RATINGS
I think KB3001 does have a point; FPGA guys are also trying to get into the base station market by replacing DSP and Microprocessor functionalities. But what determines the winner in the end is not the hardware functionalities; but credible tools and ecosystem they can offer on the network equipment market.

Jayakumar
User Rank
Author
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
Jayakumar   2/15/2011 2:05:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Very good write up. We in Epigon (www.epigon.in) use Virtex 5 FPGA for OFDM Phy. For higher bandwidth ( may be higher side of 1.5 mbps), we found even Virtex 5 not able to provide computing resources. My question is : How much bandwidth processing cab be done in these two DSP's ( from TI and Freescale). In a sense, is it possible to mod and demod more then 2 mbps OFDM phy in the above DSP's. In case yes, then epigon will be happy to migrate from FPGA's to DSP's. For low bandwidth Modems we use TI5510 DSP and Blackfin DSP. you can reach me at jk@epigon.in

viveka27
User Rank
Author
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
viveka27   2/15/2011 5:47:54 AM
NO RATINGS
Very good write up. "Freescale is rolling out a scalable, multimode wireless base station ....designed to scale from small cells (Femto and Pico) .... " the Femto cell referred here is what Qualcomm also is after??? Can you please also write on where does Qualcomm stand in this race?

05
User Rank
Author
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
05   2/15/2011 6:36:40 AM
NO RATINGS
How about LSI? As we know LSI also participate into this game and release ACP multicore and Starcore DSP. It seems they are targeting wirelesss application too. How to compare with TI/Freescale?

ajoneill
User Rank
Author
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
ajoneill   2/15/2011 4:33:55 PM
NO RATINGS
I believe the FPGA players have a challenge defending their base station position because their chips cost so much. Moving to CPU+DSP SoCs should be able to reduce the semiconductor bill of materials by something like **90%**.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...