Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Kinnar
User Rank
CEO
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
Kinnar   2/14/2011 8:09:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Advancements in the Base Station chip-sets is extremely required to be the maximum efficiency out of it, but simultaneously it is also required that the BTS will support all previous and future technologies and standards, by one or another way, otherwise it will be very difficulty situation in a country like India where the service provider will be having their presence thought the country.

Davide Barra
User Rank
Rookie
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
Davide Barra   2/14/2011 4:44:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Our Company is pleased for being mentioned upon the collaboration with Texas Instruments and would like to highlight that the correct name is Azcom Technology and not Axcom, as reported in the article herein. For further details, please go at http://www.azcom.it.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
junko.yoshida   2/14/2011 9:14:45 PM
NO RATINGS
I do apologize for my misspelling. It's my bad. Sorry!

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
KB3001   2/14/2011 7:13:50 PM
NO RATINGS
I wonder what FPGA companies such as Xilinx and Altera have to say about this two-horse race? Any comments out there?

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
old account Frank Eory   2/14/2011 11:22:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Why would they have anything to say about it? Making a "base station on a chip" is way outside of their core businesses.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
junko.yoshida   2/15/2011 1:29:56 AM
NO RATINGS
I think KB3001 does have a point; FPGA guys are also trying to get into the base station market by replacing DSP and Microprocessor functionalities. But what determines the winner in the end is not the hardware functionalities; but credible tools and ecosystem they can offer on the network equipment market.

Jayakumar
User Rank
Rookie
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
Jayakumar   2/15/2011 2:05:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Very good write up. We in Epigon (www.epigon.in) use Virtex 5 FPGA for OFDM Phy. For higher bandwidth ( may be higher side of 1.5 mbps), we found even Virtex 5 not able to provide computing resources. My question is : How much bandwidth processing cab be done in these two DSP's ( from TI and Freescale). In a sense, is it possible to mod and demod more then 2 mbps OFDM phy in the above DSP's. In case yes, then epigon will be happy to migrate from FPGA's to DSP's. For low bandwidth Modems we use TI5510 DSP and Blackfin DSP. you can reach me at jk@epigon.in

viveka27
User Rank
Rookie
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
viveka27   2/15/2011 5:47:54 AM
NO RATINGS
Very good write up. "Freescale is rolling out a scalable, multimode wireless base station ....designed to scale from small cells (Femto and Pico) .... " the Femto cell referred here is what Qualcomm also is after??? Can you please also write on where does Qualcomm stand in this race?

05
User Rank
Rookie
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
05   2/15/2011 6:36:40 AM
NO RATINGS
How about LSI? As we know LSI also participate into this game and release ACP multicore and Starcore DSP. It seems they are targeting wirelesss application too. How to compare with TI/Freescale?

ajoneill
User Rank
Rookie
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
ajoneill   2/15/2011 4:33:55 PM
NO RATINGS
I believe the FPGA players have a challenge defending their base station position because their chips cost so much. Moving to CPU+DSP SoCs should be able to reduce the semiconductor bill of materials by something like **90%**.

Adele.Hars
User Rank
Rookie
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
Adele.Hars   2/15/2011 4:44:04 PM
NO RATINGS
By way of information, for the QorIQ processors & DSPs, Freescale went to 45nm SOI, which they say gave them a big edge (see http://bit.ly/hN1j0N).

Krutsch
User Rank
Rookie
re: Freescale vs. TI: Base station SoC battle
Krutsch   2/21/2011 7:59:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Actually the DSP cores do not really do all the heavy processing. For some of the key algorithms you have MAPLE (in case of Freescale); it is like you have your custom ASIC on SOC. From my point of view the strength of the solution is the integration of power, accelerator and DSP in the same SOC enabling smaller size and less power. The competition between base-station providers will move more into the RF and antenna components part.. Base-station providers can make their own SOC but I just want to see who has the money and time to do this sort of staff… In terms of FPGA, they will be around in solutions as long as there is no common interface from ADCs to DSPs. Still hope that JESD 204 will be supported someday… or any other..



Most Recent Comments
didymus7
 
cd2012
 
GerryWood
 
prabhakar_deosthali
 
prabhakar_deosthali
 
prabhakar_deosthali
 
stevestark002
 
David Ashton
 
R_Colin_Johnson
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).