USB2 is not only reasonably low bit rate, it's also high overhead. I'm sure it can be made to work, but I don't understand why it's desirable. I wonder if this is a short term solution until something better (from MIPI?) is available and stable.
Article title is little bit confusing. ("Qualcomm licenses USB chip interface" )
According to article Qualcomm exited from USB-IF group i.e. now Qualcomm is looking for some other solution like MIPI-LLI. Then, how can they license USB chip interface.
Looking forward to see expert commnets.
Blog Doing Math in FPGAs Tom Burke 23 comments For a recent project, I explored doing "real" (that is, non-integer) math on a Spartan 3 FPGA. FPGAs, by their nature, do integer math. That is, there's no floating-point ...