USB2 is not only reasonably low bit rate, it's also high overhead. I'm sure it can be made to work, but I don't understand why it's desirable. I wonder if this is a short term solution until something better (from MIPI?) is available and stable.
Article title is little bit confusing. ("Qualcomm licenses USB chip interface" )
According to article Qualcomm exited from USB-IF group i.e. now Qualcomm is looking for some other solution like MIPI-LLI. Then, how can they license USB chip interface.
Looking forward to see expert commnets.
My Mom the Radio Star Max MaxfieldPost a comment I've said it before and I'll say it again -- it's a funny old world when you come to think about it. Last Friday lunchtime, for example, I received an email from Tim Levell, the editor for ...
A Book For All Reasons Bernard Cole1 Comment Robert Oshana's recent book "Software Engineering for Embedded Systems (Newnes/Elsevier)," written and edited with Mark Kraeling, is a 'book for all reasons.' At almost 1,200 pages, it ...