Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
bingdao
User Rank
Author
re: Samsung CEO: Headwinds hinder PRAM
bingdao   11/30/2011 2:11:00 AM
NO RATINGS
So Mr volative Memory, could you please give me a link that I could find Mr.Neale's recent articles. I am also very intreseted with the negative side of PCM. Thank you very much~

Araucaria
User Rank
Author
re: Samsung CEO: Headwinds hinder PRAM
Araucaria   2/23/2011 11:49:16 AM
NO RATINGS
The problem with PCM is that it isn't a drop in replacement for other memory types and it needs the system people to optimise for it. See for example: http://www.cs.rochester.edu/~ipek/cacm10.pdf It seems systems designers are not yet ready to do so.

efan999
User Rank
Author
re: Samsung CEO: Headwinds hinder PRAM
efan999   2/22/2011 9:47:22 PM
NO RATINGS
selinz: The rumor last Fall was that Samsung yanked out the PRAM MCP out of their own cell phones due to power-consumption issues.

efan999
User Rank
Author
re: Samsung CEO: Headwinds hinder PRAM
efan999   2/22/2011 9:45:05 PM
NO RATINGS
EFosters: Actually, the jury is in and the case is closed. You apparently have not read Mr. Neale's recent articles on PCM/PRAM published by EE Times. You should.

selinz
User Rank
Author
re: Samsung CEO: Headwinds hinder PRAM
selinz   2/22/2011 7:40:25 PM
NO RATINGS
It's amusing that Samsung is vertically integrated so this reluctance is obviously in house... There must be more to the story.

EFosters
User Rank
Author
re: Samsung CEO: Headwinds hinder PRAM
EFosters   2/22/2011 7:15:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Good points everyone. In the end, potential dispruptive technologies like PCM/PRAM need to show substantial improvement that matters over today's technology. The jury is still out and that's why there's not much prodution today. Can PCM or any of the other contending "universal memories" be commercially viable for cost-efficient, volume production? Will they exceed the benefits of today’s technology by a degree large enough to justify customer and industry investment in rearchitecting? I think we are a long way away.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Samsung CEO: Headwinds hinder PRAM
resistion   2/22/2011 12:41:52 PM
NO RATINGS
It's hard to beat standard robust metals and oxides for memory materials, instead of dealing with peculiar characteristics like glass flow and ferro.

efan999
User Rank
Author
re: Samsung CEO: Headwinds hinder PRAM
efan999   2/22/2011 5:49:40 AM
NO RATINGS
Actually, Numonyx 1Gbit 45nm device was supposed to ship in 2009. Then in early 2010. Then in late 2010. Now, never. Samsung's PRAM was found in just one fake, planted, non-commercial handset (I mean one unit!) - since destroyed. Yes, the initial specs for Samsung GT-E2550 called for PRAM, but it turned out PRAM simply uses to much power and drains the battery, so the PRAM was quickly replaced back with NOR. No Samsung phone currently in production uses any PRAM. No other phones or any other commercial products use any PCM/PRAM either. PCM/PRAM sucks. It is horribly overpriced, too slow and power-hungry in write, unreliable, with poor density, and it does not scale. It is the longest-running Techno-Ponzi scheme, but it is now coming to an end. Finally.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Samsung CEO: Headwinds hinder PRAM
krisi   2/22/2011 12:44:59 AM
NO RATINGS
I am finding the statement that systems guys are slow in adopting PRAM for unknown reasons a little suspicious. I think if the advantage of PRAM was obvious everyone and his grandmother would be implementing those memories...Kris



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...