@RickMerrit: thanks for the writeup, didn't see you at the Computer History Museum for the 40th Anniversary of Spice event (most ISSCC attendees made it there!).
I wonder why IBM isn't using their Power7 platform to push the clock speeds instead of the z196. The Power6 older generation was already clocking at 4.5GHz whereas Power7 had already reached 5.0GHz (8-core version?). The Power7 also has a L3 cache of 32Mb max.
I strongly suspect Rick is right. Out of order techniques don't yield 40% perf improvements across the board, all by themselves. 20 - 25%, maybe. How well the compiler understands the new, complex microarch is another strong factor. After that you have cache design, bus design, policies on TLB usage, provisions for coherence, and how aggressive you were on lots of other things.
Actually it is good to see an edging up on the frequency. The move to an out-of-order design (40% improvement) is a key advancement along with an increase of 18% in frequency.
I would expect the frequency might edge up a little more over time with the same basic design, but the "step" function of 40% for OOE is the kicker..
I actually know something about both projects, ex-IBMer and ex-MIPS executive..
My Mom the Radio Star Max MaxfieldPost a comment I've said it before and I'll say it again -- it's a funny old world when you come to think about it. Last Friday lunchtime, for example, I received an email from Tim Levell, the editor for ...
A Book For All Reasons Bernard Cole1 Comment Robert Oshana's recent book "Software Engineering for Embedded Systems (Newnes/Elsevier)," written and edited with Mark Kraeling, is a 'book for all reasons.' At almost 1,200 pages, it ...