Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
agk
User Rank
Rookie
re: Medtech prognosis: Going digital, under stress
agk   2/28/2011 4:00:44 PM
NO RATINGS
FDA taking more time to approve is right i feel. These are life saving gadgets and to be tested for its reliable functionality without any harm to the people who will use it.FDA can employ more number of experienced people to speed up this process of approving so that more and more advanced gadgets will come faster to extend people's lives

agk
User Rank
Rookie
re: Medtech prognosis: Going digital, under stress
agk   2/28/2011 4:00:44 PM
NO RATINGS
FDA taking more time to approve is right i feel. These are life saving gadgets and to be tested for its reliable functionality without any harm to the people who will use it.FDA can employ more number of experienced people to speed up this process of approving so that more and more advanced gadgets will come faster to extend people's lives

Streetrodder
User Rank
Rookie
re: Medtech prognosis: Going digital, under stress
Streetrodder   2/24/2011 4:08:52 PM
NO RATINGS
I have to look at this from the other end of the spectrum. I'm a Biomedical/Clinical Engineer in the VA. My peers and I are responsible for managing the systems after they are in use. Among other duties, am responsible for managing hazards involving medical equipment once it's deployed nationawide. What I see is a lot of vendors jumping at the bit to dump devices into healthcare without considering useability, lifecycle management or responding to post-market issues. I also see a lot of devices that are being promoted as alarm replacement technologies that aren't reliable enough to do so. The user community would be happy to work with the manufacturers to limit this. We're tired of coming in to fix the devastation left behind after the latest whiz-bang technology doesn't live up to its hype. Paul Sherman

Streetrodder
User Rank
Rookie
re: Medtech prognosis: Going digital, under stress
Streetrodder   2/24/2011 4:08:52 PM
NO RATINGS
I have to look at this from the other end of the spectrum. I'm a Biomedical/Clinical Engineer in the VA. My peers and I are responsible for managing the systems after they are in use. Among other duties, am responsible for managing hazards involving medical equipment once it's deployed nationawide. What I see is a lot of vendors jumping at the bit to dump devices into healthcare without considering useability, lifecycle management or responding to post-market issues. I also see a lot of devices that are being promoted as alarm replacement technologies that aren't reliable enough to do so. The user community would be happy to work with the manufacturers to limit this. We're tired of coming in to fix the devastation left behind after the latest whiz-bang technology doesn't live up to its hype. Paul Sherman

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Medtech prognosis: Going digital, under stress
goafrit   2/24/2011 12:40:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Wireless enabled medical devices is the future and that will have huge impact in the world. This will become the next big thing after the present fascinations with social media.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Medtech prognosis: Going digital, under stress
goafrit   2/24/2011 12:40:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Wireless enabled medical devices is the future and that will have huge impact in the world. This will become the next big thing after the present fascinations with social media.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Medtech prognosis: Going digital, under stress
rick merritt   2/22/2011 10:37:39 PM
NO RATINGS
@Warren: Any experiences with the FDA you care to share?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Medtech prognosis: Going digital, under stress
rick merritt   2/22/2011 10:37:39 PM
NO RATINGS
@Warren: Any experiences with the FDA you care to share?

Warren3
User Rank
CEO
re: Medtech prognosis: Going digital, under stress
Warren3   2/22/2011 8:24:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Gee, I sure hope the following is not a surprise to the FDA: "In the final analysis, most executives are confident digital technology will drive new opportunities in medical electronics for many years to come." Neither should the final sentence in that paragraph be a surprise: "They [medtech execs] are less sure whether those opportunities will be realized in the States."

Warren3
User Rank
CEO
re: Medtech prognosis: Going digital, under stress
Warren3   2/22/2011 8:24:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Gee, I sure hope the following is not a surprise to the FDA: "In the final analysis, most executives are confident digital technology will drive new opportunities in medical electronics for many years to come." Neither should the final sentence in that paragraph be a surprise: "They [medtech execs] are less sure whether those opportunities will be realized in the States."



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).