Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
markhahn0
User Rank
Author
re: Thunderbolt interface rattles placid PC landscape
markhahn0   3/7/2011 7:49:25 PM
NO RATINGS
three pages in this article, and still no real explanation of why TB exists. is there any evidence at all that Intel intends something more ambitious than yet another peripheral interface? I had hopes they were trying to do a sort of "IB without the pretenses". but the coverage so far makes it look like a "decommoditization" effort (against USB).

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Thunderbolt interface rattles placid PC landscape
rick merritt   3/8/2011 12:24:54 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel's rationale is that the dual, bi-directional 10 Gbit/s links open up possibilities for faster synching, video transfer and Express outside the PC box--things it says are not possible with the single 5 Gbits/s max USB 3.0.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Thunderbolt interface rattles placid PC landscape
krisi   3/8/2011 5:25:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Can we get someone from Intel marketing to comment here? Kris

Warren3
User Rank
Author
re: Thunderbolt interface rattles placid PC landscape
Warren3   3/8/2011 6:14:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, would you agree the Intel explanation is generally accurate; the technology looks to do what they say and that no other single solution does?

_hm
User Rank
Author
re: Thunderbolt interface rattles placid PC landscape
_hm   3/8/2011 7:03:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I also request Apple application expert to highlight more into their visage as applications for end user.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Thunderbolt interface rattles placid PC landscape
rick merritt   3/8/2011 7:04:51 PM
NO RATINGS
@ Warren: I think Thunderbolt does what Intel claims, but the other side suggests there are real costs and no killer apps for the 5-10G space it has exclusive claim to in PC I/O. @Iniewski: I will try to ping Intel to jump in here.

AlunWang
User Rank
Author
re: Thunderbolt interface rattles placid PC landscape
AlunWang   3/10/2011 9:45:18 AM
NO RATINGS
To survive in the interconnect market, Intel will need to open the spec in the end.

jaybus0
User Rank
Author
re: Thunderbolt interface rattles placid PC landscape
jaybus0   3/11/2011 8:29:29 PM
NO RATINGS
The ability to encapsulate PCI Express in a low latency way could very well make or break TB, particularly when they graduate to full Light Peak. USB can go optical too, so won't be bound to 5 Gbps, but will still be USB only. There is a big difference between a high speed i/o, like USB 3.0, and actually extending a system bus out of the box. Consider, for example, long range chip-to-chip interconnects. A cluster system would be much less like a bunch of computers networked together and much more like a single machine that just so happened to have its chips spread out amongst several different physical boxes.

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
re: Thunderbolt interface rattles placid PC landscape
docdivakar   3/21/2011 10:38:14 PM
NO RATINGS
@AlunWang: You are right, the specs need to be open if Intel wants others to join. @rick.merritt: the 10Gig PHY/controllers can do the same today although their costs and power/thermal problems are still lingering. But volume adoption and better designs are forcing innovations there any way. Today you can AV-Bridge over RJ45. So there are cost effective existing solutions for faster synching and video transfer today! Some advantages I see for TB is in displayport in lieu of USB. I don't buy the latency argument (where it matters, financial markets for round trip execution times, InfiniBand is firmly entrenched any way!); even Ethernet can reach microsecond latencies with offload engines. Dr. MP Divakar

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Thunderbolt interface rattles placid PC landscape
krisi   3/21/2011 10:52:17 PM
NO RATINGS
@docdivakar, interesting comments on latency...would you be interested in expanding them to a short book chapter? (say, compare TB, USB, InfiniBand etc)...if so pls let me know, kris.iniewski@gmail.com

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...