Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Silicon_Smith
User Rank
Author
re: Time to 'Get Smart'?
Silicon_Smith   3/30/2011 7:27:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I am surprised. Too surprised actually. I switched to a smartphone three years ago and all I see around me are smart ones. As I read the article, "given that I spend my days investigating and researching and writing about the latest high-tech communications products" and "But, now friends are telling me that Android phones are the way to go..", it reflects a lot on how many of our decisions get influenced by opinion and not knowing. No wonder the comments sections are always as popular as the articles themselves.

JanineLove
User Rank
Author
re: Time to 'Get Smart'?
JanineLove   3/30/2011 2:36:01 PM
NO RATINGS
OK. So, in an effort to postpone any decisions, I ordered a new battery for $3.97 from Amazon. Charged it up last night and I'm good to go. I'll let you know if and when I ever get my own smartphone. Though, the more I read your comments and think about it, I think it will be quite some time. I already work too much!! Work doesn't have to chase me on that rare day I hit the beach...

MindTech
User Rank
Author
re: Time to 'Get Smart'?
MindTech   3/25/2011 9:11:46 PM
NO RATINGS
I made the jump. Got the Atrix. I mostly love it. I have to spend a bunch of time purging and cleaning my social contact list tho before I want to connect the accounts to the device. I hooked up my Google account and had over 200 contacts, most of which were outdated emails all auto-magically imported from my gmail account. I'm not much of a social butterfly so I need to dust off my twitter and facebook accounts before I attach them to my phone. I love the browser tho. Now I can get news and updates right in my pocket. I just wish I could afford the laptop dock, so I could do more browsing on the go.

deanb
User Rank
Author
re: Time to 'Get Smart'?
deanb   3/25/2011 8:37:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Usually I am a very late adopter. But I got an Android phone in December. No problems syncing email, but I have chosen not to connect the phone into to my company's email system because I've been told that the company's software rules then prevent you from being able to do certain things with your own phone. I'm not even talking about XXX stuff, just normal web surfing. I use several cool apps, the GPS works great, and overall I like it a lot. But I don't like paying for the data plan. And after my 2 years are up, I very well may drop back to a "dumb" phone to save the $30/mo. If so, I will miss it, but I won't miss paying for it.

Polyspace
User Rank
Author
re: Time to 'Get Smart'?
Polyspace   3/25/2011 8:26:55 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm pondering the decision to upgrade as well. I do not need, nor do I want to pay for the data plan. A dumb phone and tablet might be better, but I would like to carry only one device around. If I do take this leap, than I would get an Android power phone, if only to synch easily with my google calendar and such. Oh, and Brian, I work in semiconductors and even we don't get company phones. (We do get a discount on service, though.)

Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Author
re: Time to 'Get Smart'?
Brian Fuller2   3/24/2011 5:25:34 PM
NO RATINGS
So, wait, nobody on this thread gets a company-issued smart phone in 2011? Do you all have to use personal phones if you want a mobile phone? (These could be shockingly naive questions)...

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Author
re: Time to 'Get Smart'?
Robotics Developer   3/24/2011 1:17:14 AM
NO RATINGS
I do not need nor want to text/surf the web/ code / etc. on my phone. I only need a phone (not even the camera!!). I sit in front of a computer all the time and don't need another one to travel...

zeeglen
User Rank
Author
re: Time to 'Get Smart'?
zeeglen   3/23/2011 10:58:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Every time I needed a new battery I was informed that replacement batteries were no longer manufactured and I had to 'upgrade' for a fee. Now my latest forced phone has features on it I never bother to use, even though by today's standards it is still considered a dumb phone. I dread what I might be forced to accept when my current dumb phone battery craps out.

jimfordbroadcom
User Rank
Author
re: Time to 'Get Smart'?
jimfordbroadcom   3/23/2011 9:37:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Yep, here's to late adopters. No smart phone for me in the foreseeable future. Can't justify the extra monthly expense; my dumb phone has what I call the "they don't even want you to know they have it" $30/mo. plan from Verizon. Same exact phone for almost 5 years now; if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Another thing stopping me from joining the smartphone revolution is the complexity and time consumption that goes along with fiddling with yet another device with an operating system. I just know I'd be spending precious minutes or even hours a day trying to synchronize with my home and work computers.

MindTech
User Rank
Author
re: Time to 'Get Smart'?
MindTech   3/22/2011 5:37:43 PM
NO RATINGS
I am just about to jump head-first into the smart phone pool. 2 phones ago (6 years) I was basic, no frills calling. With the last phone I got on board with texting when I bought a phone with a keyboard. Now I want something I can play with, tinker with, program for, and hopefully reconnect to some light social networking with. I've felt disconnected for the past few months since we had a baby and I don't get as much (or hardly any) computer time anymore. Having something that can actually twitter, facebook, and maybe do some light blogging from would be amazing. I'm just about to go and get the Atrix, because the thought of a dual processor system in my hand makes me giggle a little.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...