Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
neilrieck
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is the end near for Intel's Itanium?
neilrieck   3/29/2011 11:08:59 AM
NO RATINGS
The biggest thumb-in-the-eye problem for Itanium was that it required new compiler technology (for EPIC technology) which was never developed. As I understand it, most speed improvements from Itanium came from other technologies like: moving to DDR3 memory, die shrinks, multiple cores, all which would have all happened had Intel stuck with HP's super-scalar RISC (PA-RISC, DEC-Alpha, etc). Okay so now the "big race" is down to three horses: Itanium from Intel, POWER from IBM, SPARC from Oracle/Sun. Meanwhile, x86-64 gets more powerful every 18 months and many people wonder if the big three horses are on the verge of becoming irrelevant. With Oracle pushing SPARC, Intel and HP only have one option: Give Oracle's hardware business a spanking by dropping the price of Itanium hardware and software. p.s. server sales over the past 12 months show HP-Itegrity (HP's brand for Itanium platforms) with at least 80% market share in the Enterprise Server Category. Having Oracle withdraw enterprise's favorite database product will cause this number to drop. Other than a full-scale price war with Oracle, HP doesn't have any other choice than to send Oracle payola to save Oracle on Itanium (cutting Oracle in on Integrity profits)

markhahn0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is the end near for Intel's Itanium?
markhahn0   3/24/2011 5:08:07 AM
NO RATINGS
the best way to understand iAPX 432 is simply "the anti-RISC" - it's almost as if they looked at everything Cocke et al were learning, and chose the opposite. anyway, ia64 was very usable, and sometimes even competitive in performance. the problem was that x86_64 was so much easier to get along with, vastly cheaper, and soon ubiquitous. the story for ia64 was basically over as soon as Intel gave in to AMD's x86_64. proponents still argue that ia64 has unmatched RAS, but the fact is that modern service architecture is based on having lots of machines, rather than one gold-plated megabox with hotswap raid1 dimms. there's still a market, tiny in volume, for mainframes, though. I don't think that's enough for ia64 to survive on though.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Is the end near for Intel's Itanium?
eewiz   3/24/2011 4:12:19 AM
NO RATINGS
iAPX-432!! I had to google to find out what it is :) For others, wiki says "The Intel iAPX 432 was a commercially unsuccessful 32-bit microprocessor architecture, introduced in 1981."

Larry M
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is the end near for Intel's Itanium?
Larry M   3/23/2011 8:49:04 PM
NO RATINGS
You wrote: "Several years ago, Intel rolled out Itanium for high-end servers. The product was late and has been a major bust. Perhaps it is Intel's biggest mistake ever." Even worse than the iAPX-432? I don't think so.

mark.lapedus
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is the end near for Intel's Itanium?
mark.lapedus   3/23/2011 4:44:09 PM
NO RATINGS
It's no surprise if Intel drops Itanium. Yes or no? Thoughts out there?



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).