Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Report: Computing has hit 'power wall'
KB3001   4/8/2011 1:45:27 PM
NO RATINGS
For sure that would help but there is always an issue of critical mass and economies of scale. Graphics can afford specialised, increasingly powerful, and relatively cheap processors because of the size of the market. Who is going to take the hit of a large investment for equivalent technologies in other applications? What is the killer app.?

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Report: Computing has hit 'power wall'
KB3001   4/8/2011 1:40:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, time has come to re-examine these assumptions. However, we have to do it in an incremental way because there are economic concerns here. Billions and billions of investment in hardware, software and applications have been expended with the Von-Neumann paradigm in mind. It is not reasonable to put that aside in favour of a new paradigm no matter how great is this new paradigm in theory.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Report: Computing has hit 'power wall'
KB3001   4/8/2011 1:37:22 PM
NO RATINGS
New hardware technologies and more optimised algorithms can give higher performance for less power, yes.

meheri2r
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: Computing has hit 'power wall'
meheri2r   3/31/2011 8:54:31 AM
NO RATINGS
Using parallel architectures we can trade area for dynamic power consumption. We can get the desired speed performance even if we operate at lower frequency. Because, the propagation delay is nearly inversely proportional to operating voltage, if we decide to operate the system at lower frequency, then we can be able to run the system at lower operating voltage. Since dynamic power dissipation is proportional to square of the operating voltage, parallel processing results in lower power consumption. This basically allows us to trade area for power. But, in certain problems, e. g, in some signal processing problems like digital filtering, where latency of computation is not a main issue, one can achieve lower power consumption by pipelining with less area overhead compared to parallel processing.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: Report: Computing has hit 'power wall'
Duane Benson   3/28/2011 2:08:27 AM
NO RATINGS
Parallel processing will help, but maybe we need more than that. Perhaps it's time to look not only at parallel equal processing cores, but also at collections of tailored processors For example, the Nvidia processor with a graphic core and a general computing core. In the personal computer world, it's been well established that systems benefit from a combination of a graphics processor and a general computing processor. Years ago, floating point was done in software, or with a discrete co-processor. Today systems have the processing core(s), with built in floating point, and discrete graphic processors. Perhaps more efficiencies could be gained by developing dedicated database cores, communications cores and that like. The requirements for high performance graphics work are different from that of database, and from communications, signal processing and a number of other functions. Make each processing core as efficient for the type of work that it's designed for and less computing power will be required to translate a general purpose core to the specific needs of some of these sub-systems.

jmgbel
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: Computing has hit 'power wall'
jmgbel   3/27/2011 11:14:53 AM
NO RATINGS
The performance requirements are just increasing (games, video,...). In order to get a system meet the performance requirements they are only three solutions: raw clock speed, parallelism and dedicated processors. Raw clock speed comes at the expense of power. In low geometry processes there is a choose between different Vt voltages. The lower the higher the speed and the power consumption. Parallelism can be obtained by either hardware or software. The first solution is hardware by using mult-issue out of order super scalar architectures. Also high end processor use power expensive branch predictors. Software parallelism comes however power-wise for free. The last issue is about dedicated processors or rather the cost of legacy support. The extreme is the use of specialised processors for 3D graphics or even audio playback. Intel still needs to support the old 8086 instruction set. So they place down complex instruction decoders. ARM on the other hand supports more instruction set and is thus more efficient.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
re: Report: Computing has hit 'power wall'
elctrnx_lyf   3/26/2011 8:51:23 PM
NO RATINGS
The power consumption is a major criteria for the electronics only in the case of battery operated systems. Otherwise I do not think the power consumed by the electronic components is not going to create any major difference. I would like to see more research in the better battery technologies and more alternative energy sources.

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
re: Report: Computing has hit 'power wall'
LarryM99   3/26/2011 8:15:41 PM
NO RATINGS
The discussion on another story regarding parallel architectures brought out several good points, including the thought that maybe it's time to reexamine the Von Neumann architecture. Is it time to rethink these fundamental assumptions? Larry M.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Report: Computing has hit 'power wall'
DrQuine   3/26/2011 2:52:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Within a technology, more processor activity and more processors require more power. However, new technologies may require less power. If we still ran computers using tubes, activating the complexity of current smartphones would trigger power outages in our homes rather than operating easily on a small battery. The trick is to find new technologies that are even less power hungry.

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: Report: Computing has hit 'power wall'
chanj0   3/26/2011 1:07:57 AM
NO RATINGS
The more active a processor is; the more power it consumes. The more processors are running; the more power it consumes. It is the law. How can we achieve better performance w/o consuming more power? On the other hands, parallelism is no doubt the future to hammer out the performance of next generation computing and to balance performance and power consumption. What would be the best strategies - on developer level or on compiler level or on processor level?



Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want a Voltera Desktop PCB Printer?
Max Maxfield
9 comments
I just received an email from my chum Javi in Spain. "Have you heard about Voltera (VolteraInc.com)? It's a Canadian company that is going to offer desktop-size PCB printers for fast ...

Aubrey Kagan

Have You Ever Been Blindsided by Your Own Design?
Aubrey Kagan
37 comments
I recently read GCHQ: The uncensored story of Britain's most sensitive intelligence agency by Richard J. Aldrich. The Government Communication Headquarters (GCHQ), Britain's equivalent of ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
2 comments
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
15 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...