Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Google's Android tablet delay angers OEMs
t.alex   4/9/2011 8:09:39 AM
NO RATINGS
After this move by Google, probably OEMs start thinking to look for alternative instead of solely depending on Google.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Google's Android tablet delay angers OEMs
KB3001   4/6/2011 2:00:57 PM
NO RATINGS
It makes sense for Google to want to control the way Honeycomb will be exploited. There ain't no such thing as a free lunch!

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
re: Google's Android tablet delay angers OEMs
Sheetal.Pandey   3/31/2011 10:46:22 AM
NO RATINGS
If once they have decided to put Android as open source, then why dont they want to put it open space now? Is it that Android is "THE" operating system for smartphones and other upcoming gadgets and keep the technology with them as far as they can..

lifewingmate
User Rank
Rookie
re: Google's Android tablet delay angers OEMs
lifewingmate   3/30/2011 5:54:39 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree with Luis. Google must have some reasons (waiting for Apple iPad 2 to iron out and getting feedback from the market) why it is not releasing Honeycomb. Business value is usually about "speed to market" yet open source means that everyone can cook in the kitchen. I am also cognisant of selinz's comments...UI design should consider dual functionality so that multiple devices can successfully run tablet-friendly programs. I'm sure the two borrow from each other. However, how is tablet design different from tablet PC? The lines are going to get blurred and at some point, interchangeability for speed to market will be needed.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Google's Android tablet delay angers OEMs
goafrit   3/29/2011 11:27:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Google is Android-neutral. They are not playing any favor game.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
re: Google's Android tablet delay angers OEMs
elctrnx_lyf   3/29/2011 5:22:11 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think Google is helping any tablet makers by actually delaying the release of Honeycomb. This could actually give HP and Blackberry to release their tablets with altogether different operating system and can eat the pie of delayed Android tablets.

Dave.Dykstra
User Rank
Rookie
re: Google's Android tablet delay angers OEMs
Dave.Dykstra   3/29/2011 4:50:56 AM
NO RATINGS
And, of course, there is the likelihood that iPad2 provided enough advancement that Honeycomb needs to be refined to attempt to catch up. The first one to market (especially when it is Apple) gets to set the target for the next guy who should be trying to do something better, whether technologically, pricing, or what.

Jeff.Petro
User Rank
Rookie
re: Google's Android tablet delay angers OEMs
Jeff.Petro   3/28/2011 7:28:19 PM
NO RATINGS
I can only believe that this is a tactical strategy by Google to delay "showing their cards". I would fully suspect they have a couple of 'new features' not found in other smartphones. By delaying the release far enough into their competitors product cycle, it has the potential to put them ahead of their competitors for up to 18 months while the rest play catch up.

dirk.bruere
User Rank
Rookie
re: Google's Android tablet delay angers OEMs
dirk.bruere   3/28/2011 6:13:46 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm still waiting for Honeycomb on a Tablet at a price that doesn't make iPad2 look like a bargain

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: Google's Android tablet delay angers OEMs
Duane Benson   3/28/2011 1:53:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Corporate open source brings its own set of issues. With more conventional open source, the target audience tends to understand what they are getting into. They tend to be the sort that can evaluate an update, decide if it's necessary and take the steps to implement it. They also tend to be the types that can deal with update schedules all over the map, from frequent to sporadic. In standard open source, the quality is only as good as the community supporting it. In general, the results are quite good, but still rarely polished enough for the masses. And therein lies the problem for corporate open source like Android. Google obviously wants to deliver a product that is world-class in functionality and in useability. They want it to be secure and reliable and worthy of the Google name. Once released into open source, a certain amount of the control that is needed to keep it a mass-appeal product can be lost. Either they're looking for a way to open source it and still keep enough of that control or they're deciding whether or not to even open source it.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Feast Your Orbs on My Jiggly Exercise Machine
Max Maxfield
49 comments
Last weekend, I was chatting with my mother on the phone. She's all excited that I'm coming over to visit for a week in November. "I'll be seeing you in only seven weeks," she trilled ...

Glen Chenier

Missing Datasheet Details Can Cause Problems
Glen Chenier
3 comments
It is often said that "the devil is in the details." All too often those details are hidden deep within a datasheet, where you can easily overlook them. When a datasheet reference circuit ...

David Blaza

RadioShack: The End Is Nigh!
David Blaza
121 comments
I'm feeling a little nostalgic today as I read about what looks like the imminent demise of RadioShack, at least as we currently know it. An old ubiquitous cartoon image popped into my ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)