Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Carlos1966
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
Carlos1966   4/21/2011 2:43:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Dragons, I see you don't believe in the law of the excluded middle.:-)

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
Peter Clarke   4/18/2011 9:19:04 AM
NO RATINGS
But not to do statistics!

HereBeDragons
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
HereBeDragons   4/18/2011 4:21:38 AM
NO RATINGS
Statistics can prove anything: About 30% of traffic accidents are caused by drunk drivers. Therefore 60% of accidents are caused by sober drivers. Therefore it's safer to drive drunk than sober!!!

M. Oza
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
M. Oza   4/14/2011 1:55:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Hello Jeff; Mathematically, you just summed up the entire article by Bill Schweber with three equations.

Jeff.Petro
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
Jeff.Petro   4/11/2011 2:43:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Take the fraction 0/0 (zero over zero). Using extrapolation this is equal to 0, 1 or infinity. 0/3 = 0/2 = 0/1 = 0 therefore 0/0 = 0 3/3 = 2/2 = 1/1 = 1 therefore 0/0 = 1 3/0 = 2/0 = 1/0 = infinity therefore 0/0 = infinity With the ability to skew the numbers like this, I think I missed my calling as a marketer (or politician)

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
David Ashton   4/3/2011 9:49:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Who was it who said "There are Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics"? (Just googled, Mark Twain popularised it but attributed it to Benjamin Disraeli, but that's doubtful....) Very applicable here though, bad statistics and bad extrapolations are closely related. At this rate, nothing we read in a couple of years time will be able to be believed.... :-)

ndancer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
ndancer   3/31/2011 8:30:44 PM
NO RATINGS
At this rate, statistically inaccuracies will totally overwhelm us and swamp us fifty feet deep under discarded AOL CD's in less that twenty-leben years!

fajita
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
fajita   3/31/2011 4:16:39 PM
NO RATINGS
i love that innumeracy book! i've been using that on all my Lit Major friends for decades! i agree with this article thoroughly, but i do want to make sure we remember the miracle of quasi-math laws: moore's law. that thing is the one and only legitimate one, and it's been in effect for nearly 40 years, though we may be finally coming to the end of it (how many times has that been said about moore's law??).

Rick Nelson
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
Rick Nelson   3/31/2011 3:02:17 PM
NO RATINGS
What quasi-mathematical statements turn me off? Predictions about lost productivity (usually in the $millions or $billions) because of some sporting or other event that will distract workers.

Silicon_Smith
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
Silicon_Smith   3/31/2011 2:27:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Thats why we have supercomputers calculating system dynamics for critical projects like nuclear energy, space vehicles and global economy. No trending there.



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
7 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).