Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Dandycon
User Rank
Rookie
re: Upset TI slams Samsung’s foundry efforts
Dandycon   10/26/2011 5:16:34 PM
NO RATINGS
You could have Playboy centerfold model for girlfriend, and still have some complaint about her.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
re: Upset TI slams Samsung’s foundry efforts
elctrnx_lyf   4/7/2011 4:03:25 PM
NO RATINGS
It is definitely a strategy to change your foundry partner when you are not treated as the number one customer. That is what TI did. Hope TI will get bigger reception at UMC.

Stanley_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Upset TI slams Samsung’s foundry efforts
Stanley_   4/7/2011 6:19:35 AM
NO RATINGS
Samsung will never be real foundry contender. The reason that Samsung keeps foundry business is funding R&D cost of leading edge process for their internal customer. Samsung even doesn't have R&D capability in house, thus outsourcing at IBM camp. As long as they can sustain process development by having some big guys in customer list, they don't need to take care of other customers. Some Samsung foundry guys would refuse this thought, but so far this is true considering their investment plan and the way of handling customers. One more thing. Samsung foundry is part of Samsung semiconductor division within Samsung electronics. Samsung foundry never will be a separate entity.

GREAT-Terry
User Rank
CEO
re: Upset TI slams Samsung’s foundry efforts
GREAT-Terry   4/6/2011 7:26:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Samsung is such a big manufacturer but its foundry biz is really small as compare to the Taiwanese. I don't think TI's movement will hurt the Samsung group as a whole. TI is smart in selecting different foundries for making its high performance digital product while still keep the analog fab which is relatively low cost.

Warren3
User Rank
CEO
re: Upset TI slams Samsung’s foundry efforts
Warren3   4/5/2011 11:21:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Samsung has said, and repeated, that they want to be a (real) foundry biz contender so your warnings should be heeded. But I don't know if TI's observations are typical (that others are having a similar experience) or even if they are truly valid for TI itself - TI did just make a purchase offer for National and maybe the statements by TI point out why they did so... or maybe TI's statements are because of the purchase offer.

fdunn0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Upset TI slams Samsung’s foundry efforts
fdunn0   4/5/2011 10:19:50 PM
NO RATINGS
@m00nshine While it is true that Samsung does it's own products, it does so at cost or near. Samsungs foundry business is a seperate business unit of Samsung and has to support itself without choking the Parent Corporation. The only way it does that is by keeping its lines busy with outsourced customers. As for Warrens comments the Foundy estimates are probably very close since Apple also puchases Flash Memory Components from a different division of Samsung. Samsung is a HUGE conglomerate of components and each is expected to show profit. TI moving away may not hurt Samsung while they are in good with Apple but as someone else mentioned Apple has turned on their suppliers on many different occassions for reasoning unknown outside Apple.

m00nshine
User Rank
Manager
re: Upset TI slams Samsung’s foundry efforts
m00nshine   4/5/2011 12:04:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Agree that "one customer does not make a foundry business", but its difficult to compare Samsung to any other foundry for the simple fact that Samsung is supplier/customer all in one. Is there any data available on the internal "sales" volume Samsung foundry provides to Samsung electronics and how that compares to it's outside foundry customers?

mark.lapedus
User Rank
Rookie
re: Upset TI slams Samsung’s foundry efforts
mark.lapedus   4/5/2011 5:52:11 AM
NO RATINGS
seaEE..FYI. TI exited the leading-edge, digital process technology race some time ago. They decided to outsource to the foundries on the digital side. It's too expensive and costly. TI still has fabs in analog.

mark.lapedus
User Rank
Rookie
re: Upset TI slams Samsung’s foundry efforts
mark.lapedus   4/5/2011 5:49:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the comment Warren. Here's the harsh reality for Samsung: One customer (Apple) does not make a foundry business. A foundry vendor must juggle multiple customers and try to do it well. Another warning for Samsung: Apple is fickle bunch. They can embrace a supplier and dump them too. Ask PortalPlayer.

seaEE
User Rank
CEO
re: Upset TI slams Samsung’s foundry efforts
seaEE   4/5/2011 2:03:53 AM
NO RATINGS
For some reason I thought TI had pretty good in-house fab capability. Are they still doing much in-house work?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
didymus7
 
cd2012
 
GerryWood
 
prabhakar_deosthali
 
prabhakar_deosthali
 
prabhakar_deosthali
 
stevestark002
 
David Ashton
 
R_Colin_Johnson
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).