@Warren I don't see how this article can be interesting either. Their antifuse technology is based on standard logic CMOS process and thus, it's more about luck than any major technical breakthrough. To me, it serves purely for marketing purpose.
I find it interesting and I am sure many others who care about non-mainstream silicon devices also find it interesting. Yes you are right that this is half-news and half-marketing info, but the same can be said about most other EE-times articles about new products by any silicon vendor.
I'm wondering who is finding this news article interesting and how deeply?
Peter: This item almost feels like a corporate news release that as much doubles as free advertising, riding herd on the interest they expect news regarding the TSMC 28nm process will garner. Am I way off-base here?
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.