Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
NimrodO0l1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
NimrodO0l1   6/12/2012 8:07:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Not sure I understand the reduction in engineers either, but you should get twice the parts per wafer without a shrink due to doubling of area. If you do a shrink, you might get twice again. If the number of process steps is about constant, then you expect 4x the parts per operator hour. Intel and others have estimated a 30%+ in cost per chip. It would appear that much of it comes from reduced human hours per chip.

changjm
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
changjm   10/30/2011 8:10:25 AM
NO RATINGS
We are equipment vendors to do our best to maintain the equipment and improve the process for TSMC. I think fewer engineers or operators doesn't represent the fewer people working in the fab because it will still need more professional vendors to maintain the complicated tools or improve the process in the fab because new generation machines are more complicated and expensive. Of course many professional people inside the fab without any contingencies.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
docdivakar   4/7/2011 6:40:47 PM
NO RATINGS
450mm makes sense to go to commoditized products like memory and cheap logic but creates one hell of a problem in wafer handling, especially when there is Wafer to Wafer stacking involved. But then again, TSMC said they are going to expand their packaging & test efforts, may be they are on to something that gives them an edge in this 450mm business overall. MP Divakar

chipmonk0
User Rank
CEO
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
chipmonk0   4/7/2011 5:38:42 PM
NO RATINGS
At the Symposium TSMC said that over the last 5 years they have boosted the number of process R&D engineers by 3x !! Perhaps they have finally run out of Chinese speaking Process Engr.s trained in the US and this claim of requiring fewer Engr.s as an argument for going to 450 mm is plain wishful thinking. Maintaining process uniformity over a larger wafer is never a trivial challenge and transition from 300 to 450 mm too will also require a lot of engineering resources - even if modeling etc. will help a lot more in chamber design etc.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
krisi   4/7/2011 5:05:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Rob, congrats, you have just entered dying industry!;-)...Kris

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
goafrit   4/7/2011 1:00:56 PM
NO RATINGS
They must because Intel and others are moving there. That is the future but it will not be easy. It will not be.

Warren3
User Rank
CEO
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
Warren3   4/6/2011 10:47:59 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't see this putting TSMC ahead of Samsung.

RobDinsmore
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
RobDinsmore   4/6/2011 10:44:45 PM
NO RATINGS
That's a good point Mark. I recently entered the field myself after completing my Physics Ph.D. in '08. Maybe it was just timing, but 2 different senior engineers that I interviewed with both essentially asked why I wanted to enter a dying industry. The fab engineer job also can produce a very poor quality of life. In my experience, the really good ones leave for more fulfilling careers with greater upward mobility. Well at least that's what I did, albeit I am still working on process R&D.

mark.lapedus
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
mark.lapedus   4/6/2011 9:04:03 PM
NO RATINGS
TSMC believes fewer (good) engineers will enter the IC field.....

walken1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
walken1   4/6/2011 8:50:13 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm curious as to why TSMC feels that it will become more and more difficult to attract good engineers over time. If anything, I would think that the industry consolidation and job displacement currently underway is leading to a greater surplus of engineering talent. Or perhaps is TSMC taking the long view and seeing this trend driving fewer engineering students to enter the semiconductor field in the next wave/generation? Interested in any thoughts on the matter.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

MSGEQ7-Based DIY Audio Spectrum Analyzer: Testing
Max Maxfield
13 comments
In my previous column on this topic, we discussed the step-by-step construction of the first pass at a MSGEQ7-based DIY audio spectrum analyzer for use in my BADASS Display project. Of ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)