Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
NimrodO0l1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
NimrodO0l1   6/12/2012 8:07:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Not sure I understand the reduction in engineers either, but you should get twice the parts per wafer without a shrink due to doubling of area. If you do a shrink, you might get twice again. If the number of process steps is about constant, then you expect 4x the parts per operator hour. Intel and others have estimated a 30%+ in cost per chip. It would appear that much of it comes from reduced human hours per chip.

changjm
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
changjm   10/30/2011 8:10:25 AM
NO RATINGS
We are equipment vendors to do our best to maintain the equipment and improve the process for TSMC. I think fewer engineers or operators doesn't represent the fewer people working in the fab because it will still need more professional vendors to maintain the complicated tools or improve the process in the fab because new generation machines are more complicated and expensive. Of course many professional people inside the fab without any contingencies.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
docdivakar   4/7/2011 6:40:47 PM
NO RATINGS
450mm makes sense to go to commoditized products like memory and cheap logic but creates one hell of a problem in wafer handling, especially when there is Wafer to Wafer stacking involved. But then again, TSMC said they are going to expand their packaging & test efforts, may be they are on to something that gives them an edge in this 450mm business overall. MP Divakar

chipmonk0
User Rank
CEO
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
chipmonk0   4/7/2011 5:38:42 PM
NO RATINGS
At the Symposium TSMC said that over the last 5 years they have boosted the number of process R&D engineers by 3x !! Perhaps they have finally run out of Chinese speaking Process Engr.s trained in the US and this claim of requiring fewer Engr.s as an argument for going to 450 mm is plain wishful thinking. Maintaining process uniformity over a larger wafer is never a trivial challenge and transition from 300 to 450 mm too will also require a lot of engineering resources - even if modeling etc. will help a lot more in chamber design etc.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
krisi   4/7/2011 5:05:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Rob, congrats, you have just entered dying industry!;-)...Kris

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
goafrit   4/7/2011 1:00:56 PM
NO RATINGS
They must because Intel and others are moving there. That is the future but it will not be easy. It will not be.

Warren3
User Rank
CEO
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
Warren3   4/6/2011 10:47:59 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't see this putting TSMC ahead of Samsung.

RobDinsmore
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
RobDinsmore   4/6/2011 10:44:45 PM
NO RATINGS
That's a good point Mark. I recently entered the field myself after completing my Physics Ph.D. in '08. Maybe it was just timing, but 2 different senior engineers that I interviewed with both essentially asked why I wanted to enter a dying industry. The fab engineer job also can produce a very poor quality of life. In my experience, the really good ones leave for more fulfilling careers with greater upward mobility. Well at least that's what I did, albeit I am still working on process R&D.

mark.lapedus
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
mark.lapedus   4/6/2011 9:04:03 PM
NO RATINGS
TSMC believes fewer (good) engineers will enter the IC field.....

walken1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
walken1   4/6/2011 8:50:13 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm curious as to why TSMC feels that it will become more and more difficult to attract good engineers over time. If anything, I would think that the industry consolidation and job displacement currently underway is leading to a greater surplus of engineering talent. Or perhaps is TSMC taking the long view and seeing this trend driving fewer engineering students to enter the semiconductor field in the next wave/generation? Interested in any thoughts on the matter.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Aging Brass: Cow Poop vs. Horse Doo-Doo
Max Maxfield
41 comments
As you may recall, one of the things I want to do with the brass panels I'm using in my Inamorata Prognostication Engine is to make them look really old. Since everything is being mounted ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
18 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
11 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)