Back in 2009 when they made the acquisition, I have a vague recollection of one of the Founders of Pure Digital at Tiecon 2009 (May); he was gloating over the Mega Deal ; Their VC backers were all googo...gaagaa and how it was a big big win being able to sell to Cisco for close to $ 600 M;
there was some discussion that perhaps Cisco was thinking of getting into the mobile play maybe an acquisition of Nokia or even a Smartphone play - PALM ; But this is 2 years ago. We have since seen Nokia go downhill and Palm into the HP domain;
Now i get the impression that CISCO is all CHAOS. Most of their Star performers are at Start-ups or at competitors or even transitioned into Social media....as these companies have grown their own Hardware divisions;
I am hopeful that in the next 6-12 months Cisco may re-emerge a little nimbler, a lot leaner and maybe the Street will have to be OK with 55-60% Gross margins as opposed to the 70-75%;
Also Chambers should just pay the Corporate Tax due to IRS and Repatriate money back to USA;
I'm sorry people are getting laid off. I had to wonder why Cisco even bought Flip in the first place. Compare the Flip and Kodak Zi8. The Zi8 is a no-brainer. It does everything the Flip does, extra HD cables, lower purchase price and Kodak has already improved their HD product to newer sport and touchscreen models.
Like most acquisitions these days done over game of gulf or dinner fall short and like many readers indicated are slowly killing innovation. Flip was a low cost camcorder and served the market well in the early years but more recently did not expand out to include recent wireless and other sensor technologies. Nor did they venture into smart cameras that could have ended as security camera that are now highly popular as nanny watch.
Biz mode now days suck as everyone wants profit without putting in the innovation and time to add value that differentiates a product from the rest…a recipe to disaster. I would think and Flip is another casualty out of the silicon valley that larger company’s only like to see a Biz as black or white. I think it’s time to innovate and add color to the way we think, design and use retail channels to sell a product.
Smartphones are certainly displacing some of the low-end single function video cameras and digital still cameras, but I don't buy the hype that smartphones will eventually obsolete those other products.
Will the day ever come when a smartphone matches a high-end DSC or video camera in all respects? In optics, in resolution, frame rate, DSP enhancements, form factor and UI? I don't think so, unless you imagine a product category that is primarily a high quality camera, and oh by the way, it's also a phone.
It's sad news for Flip employees and users, but it makes sense. Cisco is not a consumer electronics company and the acquisition of Pure never made sense in the first place. At least with their acquisitions of Linksys and Scientific-Atlanta, there were logical affiliations with Cisco's core networking business.
It is said that smartphones are displacing the Flip but ... really? Are the newest ones (Evo, Droid, iPhone 4, etc.) at that level? My impression is that they're still a couple of years off, enough time to transform Flip into a patent portfolio.
What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.