Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Jack.L
User Rank
CEO
re: Solar firm claims efficiency record
Jack.L   4/16/2011 4:10:57 AM
NO RATINGS
It is not a matter of impressive but a incremental improvement. To the comment about energy required to manufacture ... almost nill compared to what they collect. The energy to manufacture the rest of a concentrator assembly is way higher. For regular panels, they take about 2 years to recover the energy required to manufacture. For these I expect much less. To the comment about the number of suns and clouds ... normally these are used for very sunny areas, think desert, but the efficiency does not suddenly drop to 0 below 400 suns, it just drops. In terms of cooling, most concentrator solar panels use passive cooling. Absolutely you loose efficiency due to higher temps, but still very high overall.

elPresidente
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Solar firm claims efficiency record
elPresidente   4/15/2011 1:59:27 PM
NO RATINGS
1 sun is 1000W/m/m as used iin today's solar modules

elPresidente
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Solar firm claims efficiency record
elPresidente   4/15/2011 1:56:15 PM
NO RATINGS
No. 5.5mmx5mm is a fingernail clipping. It obviously can't yield anything bigger, or it would be bigger. Call me (I'll be at the rest home, peeing in a bag by then) when it's on a 6 inch wafer and I can focus 400 suns on it. I'll get rid of the heat, give me the 'lectricity...it'll have to be for less than $1 a watt, by the way, kids.

MikeTD
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar firm claims efficiency record
MikeTD   4/15/2011 1:02:10 PM
NO RATINGS
If you want to see a real improvement in solar efficiency check out the solar Australian company K2 who in collaboration with Mears technologies have developed a technique for 60% increased efficiency.

jg_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar firm claims efficiency record
jg_   4/15/2011 2:36:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Any advance is good, but they fail to mention many details. CPV usually needs aggressive cooling to allow the Concentrate part to work, and Tj is not mentioned. I think they need to extract ~23 watts of head, from something the area of a pencil-rubber. At 1000x, that's also very focused, not so tolerant of cloud. Mirrors + Tracking + Cooling, likely dominate the costs, so the 41 or 43% detail is moot. Since cooling is costly anyway, they could be smarter to look at adding Solar-Thermal into this mix ?

ssatish
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar firm claims efficiency record
ssatish   4/15/2011 1:38:49 AM
NO RATINGS
The question is what is the amount of energy required to manufacture these cells? What is the rate of return of energy if we start using these solar cells?

PJames
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar firm claims efficiency record
PJames   4/15/2011 12:03:21 AM
NO RATINGS
Oops, unit foul... those should obviously be cm^2.

PJames
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar firm claims efficiency record
PJames   4/15/2011 12:02:14 AM
NO RATINGS
concentration factor vs normal sun illumination at earths surface, as in a parabolic mirror of 100 cm^3 focused on 1 cm^3 would be 100 suns. Only question is, what is 1 sun... avg over entire earth for a year?

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar firm claims efficiency record
Robotics Developer   4/14/2011 11:13:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I might be impressed if I knew what 400 (or 1000) suns means.. First time I have heard of that term.

mark.lapedus
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar firm claims efficiency record
mark.lapedus   4/14/2011 8:19:40 PM
NO RATINGS
anybody impressed with this or not?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
1 Comment
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).