Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
Sheetal.Pandey   4/30/2011 7:27:36 PM
NO RATINGS
lack of funds ..difficult to believe

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
rick merritt   4/29/2011 1:38:07 PM
NO RATINGS
@ Dr Quine: Your case is another good example of how inscrutible and opaque the patent system can be

daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
daleste   4/29/2011 2:50:09 AM
NO RATINGS
Reminds me of the old days when intentional counter measures were included in new designs. If it was copied, it would not work.

Dave.Dykstra
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
Dave.Dykstra   4/29/2011 2:49:29 AM
NO RATINGS
I don't know if the patent office is playing politics or not, but congress certainly is (especially the House of Representatives). It appears the idea is to find additional funding for other things wherever they can, with very little, if any, concern for the adverse ramifications caused. The patent reform bill should have been passed in some form long ago, but I doubt if we'll see it this year.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
DrQuine   4/28/2011 11:43:50 PM
NO RATINGS
How does a fast track system ensure that earlier filed standard track patents get priority for allowance by virtue of their earlier filing? Obviously a related problem already exists today since patent applications in the same subject area are being processed in parallel by different examiners. Do the examiners search through earlier filed pending applications as well as issued and rejected patents for evidence of prior art? Even with everything on the "same" track, the time lines can be very different. I filed a pair of closely related patent applications on December 8, 2008. One received first action on August 3, 2009 and final action on January 19, 2010. The other still awaits first action as of April 28, 2011!

Jeff.Petro
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
Jeff.Petro   4/28/2011 8:24:07 PM
NO RATINGS
This gave me visions of military folks going door to door selling cookies and muscling in on the Girl Guides territories causing an all out gang war. Heavily armed battalions wiping out entire troops of Girl Guides ... Oh the horror. Yikes, did I ever go off on a tangent. Return From Interrupt.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
Duane Benson   4/28/2011 5:29:53 PM
NO RATINGS
You can block an IP infringing device if you have sufficient lawyer allocated funds and if you see the infringing product before it's hammered your business. If your product is popular enough, you may very well then have to fight to block a continuous stream of infringing products. That's probably part of the reason that product design cycles are so fast these days. In the past, companies had to keep innovating and improving to keep ahead of legitimate competition. These days, it seems that not only is it a race against those legitimate competitors, but also against a host of cheap knock offs.

elPresidente
User Rank
Freelancer
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
elPresidente   4/28/2011 2:04:58 PM
NO RATINGS
There should be no fast track. Unless you're Mexican, of course - then just the US will just grant them a patent, on the spot, with no fees, and give them free patent lawyers.

elPresidente
User Rank
Freelancer
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
elPresidente   4/28/2011 2:01:19 PM
NO RATINGS
I guess you don't understand patent law. You can block, by court order, an IP infringing widget from being sold in the US, no matter who stole it from you or where they are making it.

elPresidente
User Rank
Freelancer
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
elPresidente   4/28/2011 1:59:16 PM
NO RATINGS
The thieves in Congress have their hands in everyone's pockets. Patent fees should stay within the patent office to be their operating budget. More applications means more examiners, or is that too simple for Senator Ima Corruptass to understand? In fact, ALL agencies should generate their own source of income, including the military.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer

Future Engineers: Don’t 'Trip Up' on Your College Road Trip
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer
3 comments
A future engineer shares his impressions of a recent tour of top schools and offers advice on making the most of the time-honored tradition of the college road trip.

Max Maxfield

Juggling a Cornucopia of Projects
Max Maxfield
20 comments
I feel like I'm juggling a lot of hobby projects at the moment. The problem is that I can't juggle. Actually, that's not strictly true -- I can juggle ten fine china dinner plates, but ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
41 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Karen Field

July Cartoon Caption Contest: Let's Talk Some Trash
Karen Field
151 comments
Steve Jobs allegedly got his start by dumpster diving with the Computer Club at Homestead High in the early 1970s.

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)