Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
Sheetal.Pandey   4/30/2011 7:27:36 PM
NO RATINGS
lack of funds ..difficult to believe

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
rick merritt   4/29/2011 1:38:07 PM
NO RATINGS
@ Dr Quine: Your case is another good example of how inscrutible and opaque the patent system can be

daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
daleste   4/29/2011 2:50:09 AM
NO RATINGS
Reminds me of the old days when intentional counter measures were included in new designs. If it was copied, it would not work.

Dave.Dykstra
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
Dave.Dykstra   4/29/2011 2:49:29 AM
NO RATINGS
I don't know if the patent office is playing politics or not, but congress certainly is (especially the House of Representatives). It appears the idea is to find additional funding for other things wherever they can, with very little, if any, concern for the adverse ramifications caused. The patent reform bill should have been passed in some form long ago, but I doubt if we'll see it this year.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
DrQuine   4/28/2011 11:43:50 PM
NO RATINGS
How does a fast track system ensure that earlier filed standard track patents get priority for allowance by virtue of their earlier filing? Obviously a related problem already exists today since patent applications in the same subject area are being processed in parallel by different examiners. Do the examiners search through earlier filed pending applications as well as issued and rejected patents for evidence of prior art? Even with everything on the "same" track, the time lines can be very different. I filed a pair of closely related patent applications on December 8, 2008. One received first action on August 3, 2009 and final action on January 19, 2010. The other still awaits first action as of April 28, 2011!

Jeff.Petro
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
Jeff.Petro   4/28/2011 8:24:07 PM
NO RATINGS
This gave me visions of military folks going door to door selling cookies and muscling in on the Girl Guides territories causing an all out gang war. Heavily armed battalions wiping out entire troops of Girl Guides ... Oh the horror. Yikes, did I ever go off on a tangent. Return From Interrupt.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
Duane Benson   4/28/2011 5:29:53 PM
NO RATINGS
You can block an IP infringing device if you have sufficient lawyer allocated funds and if you see the infringing product before it's hammered your business. If your product is popular enough, you may very well then have to fight to block a continuous stream of infringing products. That's probably part of the reason that product design cycles are so fast these days. In the past, companies had to keep innovating and improving to keep ahead of legitimate competition. These days, it seems that not only is it a race against those legitimate competitors, but also against a host of cheap knock offs.

elPresidente
User Rank
Freelancer
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
elPresidente   4/28/2011 2:04:58 PM
NO RATINGS
There should be no fast track. Unless you're Mexican, of course - then just the US will just grant them a patent, on the spot, with no fees, and give them free patent lawyers.

elPresidente
User Rank
Freelancer
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
elPresidente   4/28/2011 2:01:19 PM
NO RATINGS
I guess you don't understand patent law. You can block, by court order, an IP infringing widget from being sold in the US, no matter who stole it from you or where they are making it.

elPresidente
User Rank
Freelancer
re: U.S. patent office shelves fast track plan
elPresidente   4/28/2011 1:59:16 PM
NO RATINGS
The thieves in Congress have their hands in everyone's pockets. Patent fees should stay within the patent office to be their operating budget. More applications means more examiners, or is that too simple for Senator Ima Corruptass to understand? In fact, ALL agencies should generate their own source of income, including the military.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Curiosity Killed the Cat (Just Call Me Mr. Curiosity)
Max Maxfield
23 comments
My wife, Gina The Gorgeous, loves animals. She has two stupid dogs and two stupid cats. How stupid are they? Well, allow me to show you this video of the dogs that I made a couple of years ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).