Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
gumpiko
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel vying for Apple foundry business
gumpiko   8/19/2012 2:28:21 AM
NO RATINGS
I am not sure Apple should go down this road. http://www.seapowergent.com/

dhumes
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel vying for Apple foundry business
dhumes   3/21/2012 3:45:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Are you who I THINK you are? Did you live at 4615 Blackford Ave. in San Jose, CA around 1980? Please contact me! David Humes (dot com)

tb1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel vying for Apple foundry business
tb1   9/12/2011 7:44:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Food for thought: Intel once made one of the fastest ARM chips ever, the StrongArm (later called XScale), before selling it off to Marvell. One of the architects of that chip? Dan Dobberpuhl, who later started PA Semiconductor, which was afterwards bought by Apple. So many of Apple's ARM team were once designing ARM chips for Intel.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel vying for Apple foundry business
krisi   9/12/2011 6:49:58 PM
NO RATINGS
You must be kidding @goafrit...hit Samsung to oblivion??? such a dominant market player,no way...Kris

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel vying for Apple foundry business
docdivakar   5/10/2011 11:34:23 PM
NO RATINGS
@hm: it may be too premature to declare the "success" of Thunderbolt high speed interconnect. Apple has had a history of going it alone throughout its corporate history; the only differentiators this time are the much higher volume consumer devices (as opposed to desktops of the past where Apple received a drubbing!). Apple also makes it easier for others to fill in the gaps it doesn't serve (read: flash-capable devices, for one!). I don't believe Intel is going after Apple's foundry business entirely for revenue reason (there are TSMC's, UMC's of the world for lower costs for that). I think Intel sees an opportunity for technology collaborations for its next generation of Silicon. Dr. MP Divakar

ak007
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel vying for Apple foundry business
ak007   5/9/2011 10:48:22 AM
NO RATINGS
Apple is moving in the direction of rivalary with an old friend. I think it's the inner fear of Android and also the fact that Smamsung keeps it's profit margins lower and thus can outperform Apple any time!!!

rfab
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel vying for Apple foundry business
rfab   5/7/2011 11:16:27 AM
NO RATINGS
Regarding Samsung’s future as a foundry partner within TI, Ritchie said TI will rely on Samsung to a ''lesser extent’’ at 45-nm. Samsung is ''off our radar at 28-nm,’’ he said.

rfab
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel vying for Apple foundry business
rfab   5/7/2011 11:08:43 AM
NO RATINGS
Samsung in the field of non-memory still has a long way to go, their business is still no outcome SOC

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel vying for Apple foundry business
KB3001   5/7/2011 7:32:18 AM
NO RATINGS
This gives too much to Intel, in return for what exactly? I am not sure Apple should go down this road. They should stick with the well-known and trusted pure foundries. Granted the tie-up with Samsung is problematic but a tie-up with Intel would open up more and bigger problems in the future.

Don Scansen
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel vying for Apple foundry business
Don Scansen   5/6/2011 7:00:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Once again, EE Times readers have offered a lot of valuable opinion and reasonable speculation. Let me just add a couple points briefly even if they have been alluded to previously. Moving to Intel as a foundry does not mean moving from ARM to X86. It could be further down the road and be something proprietary developed (or acquired) by Apple. Also, Intel has lots of motivation to take on Apple business, not least of which might be staving off a surging Samsung who have long set their sights on being the world #1 semiconductor company.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
10 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).