Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
R G.Neale
User Rank
Rookie
re: Chipworks tears down Samsung PCM phone
R G.Neale   5/4/2011 8:07:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Peter you are in the Catbird Seat, what about a formal request to Samsung to clarify the situation with respect to these phones and findings. The pcbs in the tear down appear to have Samsung ID on them and as far as it is possible to determine from the photographs there is no clear sign of rework on the pcb. If so that would suggest to me that Samsung actually fabricated the phones. The worrying question is if Samsung are seriously trying to get PCM design wins why would Samsung not shout from the rooftops, we have made the commitment to PCM, proved the point, it's now your turn. I did write to Samsung asking for clarification on the status of their 1G-bit-so far no reply

Kinnar
User Rank
CEO
re: Chipworks tears down Samsung PCM phone
Kinnar   5/4/2011 11:42:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Much time is spent after the first unsuccessful use of PCM, and by that time Flash Memory has traveled a successful trip virtually in most of the portable devices, even Samsung is also try to come with Flash bases HDDs. Looking at this it will be really very hard time to prove PCM.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Chipworks tears down Samsung PCM phone
Peter Clarke   5/4/2011 10:24:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Ron Given the vagaries of the global supply chain, even if we knew when the phones were bought, I don't believe we could be clear as to whether PCM usage is increasing or has been stopped. The only people that know that are in Samsung.

R G.Neale
User Rank
Rookie
re: Chipworks tears down Samsung PCM phone
R G.Neale   5/4/2011 9:05:54 AM
NO RATINGS
Is the population of PCM in Samsung phones actually increasing? The original Chipworks report indicated that they had purchased six phones and only one contained PCM. In this latest report they purchased a few and "some of the phones" had PCM. This would appear to mean the PCM population is now at least two in a "few". Now providing the "few" is not greater than 12 it suggests the probability of finding a phone with a PCM is increasing! It would be nice to know the details of exactly where the phones were purchased so that the experiment could be repeated. The only information in that regard is a source of unlocked phones.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Chipworks tears down Samsung PCM phone
resistion   5/3/2011 2:29:49 PM
NO RATINGS
It's a weak claim at best, they could only reduce the DRAM usage not eliminate it.

Volatile Memory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Chipworks tears down Samsung PCM phone
Volatile Memory   5/3/2011 1:41:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Right! But Samsung lied in 2009 that "by using PRAM, the battery life of a handset can be extended over 20 percent." http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/newsView.do?news_id=1042

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Chipworks tears down Samsung PCM phone
resistion   5/3/2011 1:31:02 PM
NO RATINGS
As I understand, it's a DRAM+PCM MCP part, which is hardly a poster child for low power consumption.

Volatile Memory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Chipworks tears down Samsung PCM phone
Volatile Memory   5/3/2011 1:09:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Dear Peter: The Samsung-produced PRAM deployed in a Samsung GSM phone is NOT A COMMERCIAL DEPLOYMENT of PRAM, and PRAM has shown absolutely no promise as a potential replacement for flash non-volatile memory technology. As it was explained to you, Samsung's GT-E2550 did in fact originally have K571229ACM in the bill of materials as of Spring 2010. However, the chip was almost immediately replaced with a regular NOR MCP due to power consumption issues. I do possess a GT-E2550 handset, and it has NOR instead of PRAM. You don't believe me? Go ahead and purchase a GT-E2550 unit. You will see! Slicing dead, non-functioning chips from fake, non-commercial handsets manufactured a year ago only proves Samsung's utter failure to commercialize PRAM. PRAM is not used in any product on market today. Period. Numonyx is not developing any 1-Gbit phase-change memory in a 45-nm process. The PCM/PRAM techno-Ponzi scheme is nearly over.



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
14 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).