Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Court: Rambus improperly destroyed documents
mcgrathdylan   5/20/2011 4:17:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Here's an interesting perspective on what the decisions mean in terms of when a company should halt the shredding of documents. http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b174031b-2ecb-46f0-8797-23474191af4e

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Court: Rambus improperly destroyed documents
mcgrathdylan   5/18/2011 9:37:40 PM
NO RATINGS
My understanding is that the court basically said just that: If you are going to sue someone, don't shred a bunch of documents right before that. The implication is that something among the destroyed documents might have been evidence that may have invalidated the patents or otherwise provide reason why Micron and Hynix shouldn't have to pay to use the technology.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Author
re: Court: Rambus improperly destroyed documents
Robotics Developer   5/17/2011 4:21:40 PM
NO RATINGS
So if I understand: the courts were unhappy with RAMBUS destroying documents that may (or may not) have been relevant to the cases? It seems that they are saying the documents (in this article) related to the lawsuits but I question How would anyone know? If the documents were destroyed then it would be hard to tell. I wonder if the fix for this would be to require companies to hold on to any related (even marginally) documents beyond the lifetimes of the associated patents?

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Court: Rambus improperly destroyed documents
mcgrathdylan   5/16/2011 11:58:19 PM
NO RATINGS
The court concluded that Rambus had at least two "shred days" when it destroyed 9,000 to 18,000 pounds worth of documents. What got shredded? I don't know. I kind of doubt anybody knows. But the court's point appears to be, if you are getting ready to file some lawsuits, don't destroy documents that may be evidence. Rambus, of course, maintains that it destroyed the documents long before planning to sue Micron and Hynix.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Court: Rambus improperly destroyed documents
KB3001   5/16/2011 5:35:11 PM
NO RATINGS
It's this kind of politics that drive good Engineers away from this business!

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
re: Court: Rambus improperly destroyed documents
Sheetal.Pandey   5/16/2011 4:56:01 AM
NO RATINGS
I was under impression that rambus has strong work ethics. But IP issues are really very serious. They might have to shell out huge money. Nowadays after all who follows work ethics??

Silicon_Smith
User Rank
Author
re: Court: Rambus improperly destroyed documents
Silicon_Smith   5/14/2011 8:11:40 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree. The entire episode is confusing and probably with good reason. Even the courts are passing conflicitng verdicts to seemingly similiar cases!

daleste
User Rank
Author
re: Court: Rambus improperly destroyed documents
daleste   5/14/2011 7:08:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Companies should have a document retention policy and destroy documents past their date regularly. If they only follow the policy when the documents may cause them harm, it should be illegal.

goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: Court: Rambus improperly destroyed documents
goafrit   5/14/2011 12:59:33 AM
NO RATINGS
And this priceless. Amazing irony.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Author
re: Court: Rambus improperly destroyed documents
Robotics Developer   5/14/2011 12:33:33 AM
NO RATINGS
I am wondering why these known documents (if they are/were so important to litigation) were not entered into a previous lawsuit and therefore part of the legal records already. I am not sure what the issue is: did someone find new pertinent documents and destroy them (but told someone) or did the existence of these documents come to light some other way. It seems a little confusing.. any clarification possible?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...