Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
over50inTexas
User Rank
Author
re: Report: Smart grid could cost $476B
over50inTexas   5/24/2011 8:26:35 PM
NO RATINGS
I am less confident in the reality of savings than in the cost of implementation. If government drives & funds the change, $476B tax dollars may disappear on a wild goose chase. If market forces drive & fund the change, the benefits will be real before heavy investment.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: Report: Smart grid could cost $476B
old account Frank Eory   5/24/2011 8:01:59 PM
NO RATINGS
But even regulated monopolies want to make money, and as the aging infrastructure starts breaking down, the utility's ability to meet the demand for electricity and make a profit is compromised. The utilities might need a carrot or a stick from the government to start implementing smart grid technology, but at the same time they have to be allowed to pass on those new costs to their customers. The regulation of retail electric rates would need to be adjusted to allow those new infrastructure costs to be passed on to customers. $12/month in smart grid costs for the average residential customer seems like a small price to pay for the benefits of the smart grid.

Code Monkey
User Rank
Author
re: Report: Smart grid could cost $476B
Code Monkey   5/24/2011 7:44:40 PM
NO RATINGS
"EPRI is an independent, non-profit think tank supported by a combination of many U.S. utilities and academics". So there you have it, the foxes are telling us how much it will cost to build a new henhouse.

dirk.bruere
User Rank
Author
re: Report: Smart grid could cost $476B
dirk.bruere   5/24/2011 7:12:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Or, to put it in perspecive, about a third of what the USA has spent on 2 useless wars over the past decade.

jessebot
User Rank
Author
re: Report: Smart grid could cost $476B
jessebot   5/24/2011 7:10:08 PM
NO RATINGS
data infrastructure is owned and operated by a number of large companies competing fiercely for customer (consumer and business) dollars; the entire cell-phone industry, rollout of internet broadband, etc. etc.. Grid infrastructure is owned by semi-regulated monopolies with a vast captive customer base. Please compare apples to apples. Regulated monopolies want nothing more than to be required to do nothing; so far we have had near 100 years of incremental improvements because of "less government intervention". Want 100 more? I sure don't.

biaunm
User Rank
Author
re: Report: Smart grid could cost $476B
biaunm   5/24/2011 7:08:52 PM
NO RATINGS
I have to wonder if spending the $476B on local generation (renewable as much as possible) and thus reducing dependency on the grid wouldn't be a better investment.

anon9303122
User Rank
Author
re: Report: Smart grid could cost $476B
anon9303122   5/24/2011 6:57:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Less government intervention, the better.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Author
re: Report: Smart grid could cost $476B
Duane Benson   5/24/2011 5:47:43 PM
NO RATINGS
The U.S. data infrastructure (voice / data transmission long-distance fiber, etc) is all or nearly all fiber optic at this point. Two decades ago, it was nearly all copper and microwave. I don't know the costs involved in that transition, but it was great. Even more, of course, if you include cross-ocean fiber. How did that happen? Did the government come in and build a "smart data network?" I'm sure there were tax-cuts and subsidies here and there, but every industry gets those from time to time. but I don't recall a government initiative to convert all of our copper to fiber-optic. If the benefits are really there, this will happen bit by bit and at some point, our power infrastructure will just be virtually all "smart-grid." Other than the normal tax games played by corporate America, I don't think this is a technology that really needs much Government intervention.

<<   <   Page 3 / 3


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...