Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
RFICDUDE
User Rank
Author
re: CMOS PAs improve RF performance and save BOM for 3G mobile handsets
RFICDUDE   6/22/2011 11:44:20 AM
NO RATINGS
It is good to see a potentially market viable linear CMOS PA come to market. Blacksand announced sampling their 3G CMOS PAs a couple of months ago, so more than player is ready to enter the sand box. The Javelin proposal is an interesting approach to differentiate from the current GaAs PA solutions, but it is a circuit solution and not a CMOS versus GaAs technology solution. Integrating the bandpass response into the PA design is what saves the BOM cost. The GaAs PA folks could probably find an equivalent solution if the market pushes them into doing it. However, there are questions about the approach that need answering. 1. How well controlled is the bandpass response from part-to-part? Is the 15dB Rx rejection a guaranteed minimum rejection. 2. What is the worst case gain variation across the band. Small shifts in the response could make a big change in gain across the band. Perhaps this is ok to some extent since 2dB of filter loss has been eliminated. There are market questions too... Some GaAs PAs are multi-band such that the same PA is used across several near bands (800MHz-900MHz and 1.8GHz-2GHz). Such PAs offer cost savings by using one PA where there would normally be separate PAs for each band. So, how does the Javelin bandpass approach address this? There is also a trend in RFIC research towards designing transmitters with very low Rxband noise (below -160dBm/Hz) to eliminate the Tx SAW filter. Despite these questions, I hope linear CMOS PAs do make their way into the market. Once they get beyond having their foot in the door then the game will be on between CMOS and GaAs PAs.

WaveMan0
User Rank
Author
re: CMOS PAs improve RF performance and save BOM for 3G mobile handsets
WaveMan0   6/17/2011 12:58:04 AM
NO RATINGS
We've been hearing about CMOS PA's for years and though there has been impressive improvements and design wins, still no real threat to GaAs PA's. GaAs ASP's are below 50 cents/module and the major players all own their own fabs. CMOS has its advantage with very low cost handsets, mainly 2G/2.5G, in developing countries and with second and third-tier OEM's in places like India and China. I remember the hype about SiGe PA's a decade ago and the linearity, PAE and reliability still could not match GaAs. The only major SiGe player just got bought by Skyworks and maybe had major design win slots with WLAN and BT. BTW, RFAxis is mostly hype and has a bulk of their design wins with ZigBee module companies and small ODM's.

RED_ROUGHY
User Rank
Author
re: CMOS PAs improve RF performance and save BOM for 3G mobile handsets
RED_ROUGHY   6/15/2011 8:00:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Similar Co-existance filtering being used by RFaxis - I also wonder about any claim that RF CMOS is more efficient than GaAs

agk
User Rank
Author
re: CMOS PAs improve RF performance and save BOM for 3G mobile handsets
agk   6/12/2011 7:08:15 AM
NO RATINGS
BOM and area savings is a need of any day provided the performance and component reliability are same as was before with GaAs PA's.

JanineLove
User Rank
Author
re: CMOS PAs improve RF performance and save BOM for 3G mobile handsets
JanineLove   6/11/2011 2:14:30 AM
NO RATINGS
There has long been talk of CMOS PAs. What do you think of Javelin's proposal?



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...