Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
golfguy0101
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscopes and ENOB
golfguy0101   4/9/2013 9:02:21 PM
NO RATINGS
My name is Ernie, a frustrated R&S employee!

ErnieE
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscopes and ENOB
ErnieE   3/15/2012 2:38:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I find that interesting and would like to know detail on your measurement setup. When comparing an RTO1024 to the Agilent MSO7104B numbers and procedure outlined in Agilent's app note, the RTO not only outperformed the MSO7K at a 1 GHz BW setting but outperformed it in a full 2 GHz BW setting. Even without correction for the fact that Agilent overlooks that 8 div scopes and 10 div scopes set to the same V/div range are not looking at the same Full Scale digitizer ranges. Even Tek noticed this about the measurements, as there are two places in Agilent's 1 GHz RMS noise tables where the Agilent appears to outperform the Tek MSO4104, but in fact underperforms when comparing noise percent of FS voltage for that range. So I am fascinated by your observations and very interested in how you came to those conclusions.

ErnieE
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscopes and ENOB
ErnieE   3/14/2012 4:59:25 PM
NO RATINGS
ENOB comparisons can be tricky, especially when coming from competing vendors that will optimise the performance of their own instrument, while glossing over those same procedures on rented instruments from their competitors. You want to know what a vendor truly does, get their representative to actually show you. Agilent will start with their claims, using V/div which is faultly logic when decades old techniques for instrumentation expect equivalent full scale comparisons. Even their app note on this, overlooks the difference between 8 vertical divisions and 10 vertical divisions of competitors. Vertical noise can be manipulated on competitors scopes in vendor comparisons to dispute their own findings. Scopes like the R&S RTO 2 gig and below instruments, don't even interleave digitizers like Agilent and Tektronix, so they are indeed quieter instruments, especially when a self alignment or calibration has not been done. The number of scope users that are not even aware of self calibration and what is does, is astounding. So the potential for any scope to actually reach it's claimed possible performance in day to day operation is minimal. The user will more likely be plagued with DC offset errors than noise errors, for precise small measurments. Also, look at if your scope vendor drops bandwidth, or loses digitizer range by zooming in on a signal to "fake" a smaller vertical range. Think about the big picture of performance and capability, don't let a vendor get you hung up on small details while glossing over how the instrument addresses your application. The field personnel present to you, what their marketing staff sell to them. Make sure they're thinking when they present to you, and not just echoing selective marketing hype.

Tomc34
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscopes and ENOB
Tomc34   1/8/2012 4:35:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Excellent article, didn't know that scope manufacturers designed their own ADC solutions. I wonder if the technology in ADCs will get to a point where they do not have to expend that effort, but then again, with ever increasing bandwidth requirements design engineers will need from their scopes, the scopes need to be one step ahead of where the technology is. Tom http://www.mitydsp.com

mig78
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscopes and ENOB
mig78   6/23/2011 7:48:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Good article. Don't mind the "grammatical error" (if there's one in the 1st place) as long as the message is delivered.

rwj2005
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscopes and ENOB
rwj2005   6/21/2011 2:45:19 PM
NO RATINGS
my goodness, can you get an editor please? reading so many grammatical errors in one article is disconcerting.

seven
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscopes and ENOB
seven   6/20/2011 4:00:20 PM
NO RATINGS
please note that in figures 5 and 6 the measured ENOB values for the 1 and 2 GHz scopes have a minimum value of 6.5 bits and a maximum 6.75 bits - more than 6.

joel.woodward
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscopes and ENOB
joel.woodward   6/17/2011 3:17:31 PM
NO RATINGS
The R&S claim of 7 ENOB is for the ADC by itself, and not the ADC in a scope. Since R&S doesn't sell the ADC by itself, users will never experience 7 effective bits on the RTO scope. The RTO series has a measured ENOB that much less: just under 6 at 500MHz, just over 6 bits at 1 GHz, and just under 6 bits at 2 GHz. Agilent 9000 is nearly identical (slightly higher than R&S at 2GHz, same at 1 GHz, and 5% lower at 500MHz).

seven
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscopes and ENOB
seven   6/17/2011 1:26:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually, there is an applicatioin note that can be found on the R&S web site: www.rohde-schwarz.us (1ER03) that describes, in detail how the ENOB is measured and shows measured ENOB values for both 1 and 2 GHz scopes

GREAT-Terry
User Rank
CEO
re: Oscilloscopes and ENOB
GREAT-Terry   6/16/2011 2:28:03 PM
NO RATINGS
We need more data in order to choose a good scope. However, more often we just can't see those chart or graphs. It reminds us some more details should be checked when considering a new scope.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
R_Colin_Johnson
 
mhrackin
 
mhrackin
 
mhrackin
 
Sheepdoll
 
betajet
 
Olaf Barheine
 
C VanDorne
 
Max The Magnificent
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Dr. Duino Diagnostic Shield Deduces Dilemmas in Arduino Shield Stacks
Max Maxfield
3 comments
As you are probably aware, I'm spending a lot of my free time creating Arduino-based projects, such as my Inamorata Prognostication Engine, my BADASS Display, and my Vetinari Clock.

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)