Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 4
daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: The rise of China's fabless industry
daleste   6/16/2011 3:31:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Good points idea guy. It does look like the US will no longer be the only place where new ideas happen. This will take us another notch down in the food chain.

daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: The rise of China's fabless industry
daleste   6/16/2011 3:31:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Good points idea guy. It does look like the US will no longer be the only place where new ideas happen. This will take us another notch down in the food chain.

idea guy
User Rank
Rookie
re: The rise of China's fabless industry
idea guy   6/16/2011 1:36:52 AM
NO RATINGS
All true. Taken to the next level, it raises questions about the future of the U.S.-based fabless semiconductor industry, where "revolutionary" technologies and products will come from, and the future for U.S. employment in the fabless semiconductor industry. First - few U.S. VC's will invest in a fabless semiconductor company today beyond an "A" round. Current levels of investment limit a potential fabless start up to the development of a proof of concept and a quick flip of the company. No money is spent on developing the infrastructure (Sales, Marketing, Engineering, Operations, Marcom, Support, Sales Channel development etc.). No infrastructure, no U.S. jobs. Job growth is where the fabless company is and the final product is manufactured - China. Second - The large, mainstream Semiconductor companies are now more focused on specific market segments or niches and are very protective of "their" market space. They leverage existing customer relationships and offer evolutionary products enhanced with new technology IP (see "flip" above), and lower prices. This make it difficult for a new company to insert a new product idea into "their" market space. So, Is the fabless model now a commodity Chinese-based industry with evolutionary extensions of current products and a focus on simple, higher levels of integration? What will fuel the investment and development of revolutionary technologies? Is there a future for the U.S. Fabless semiconductor industry?

idea guy
User Rank
Rookie
re: The rise of China's fabless industry
idea guy   6/16/2011 1:36:52 AM
NO RATINGS
All true. Taken to the next level, it raises questions about the future of the U.S.-based fabless semiconductor industry, where "revolutionary" technologies and products will come from, and the future for U.S. employment in the fabless semiconductor industry. First - few U.S. VC's will invest in a fabless semiconductor company today beyond an "A" round. Current levels of investment limit a potential fabless start up to the development of a proof of concept and a quick flip of the company. No money is spent on developing the infrastructure (Sales, Marketing, Engineering, Operations, Marcom, Support, Sales Channel development etc.). No infrastructure, no U.S. jobs. Job growth is where the fabless company is and the final product is manufactured - China. Second - The large, mainstream Semiconductor companies are now more focused on specific market segments or niches and are very protective of "their" market space. They leverage existing customer relationships and offer evolutionary products enhanced with new technology IP (see "flip" above), and lower prices. This make it difficult for a new company to insert a new product idea into "their" market space. So, Is the fabless model now a commodity Chinese-based industry with evolutionary extensions of current products and a focus on simple, higher levels of integration? What will fuel the investment and development of revolutionary technologies? Is there a future for the U.S. Fabless semiconductor industry?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: The rise of China's fabless industry
resistion   6/16/2011 12:10:50 AM
NO RATINGS
What if only Samsung has the political freedom to serve Chinese fabless; tsmc and gf would obviously come under fire.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: The rise of China's fabless industry
resistion   6/16/2011 12:10:50 AM
NO RATINGS
What if only Samsung has the political freedom to serve Chinese fabless; tsmc and gf would obviously come under fire.

<<   <   Page 4 / 4


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

The 10 Commandments of Electronics
Max Maxfield
19 comments
My chum Rick Curl dropped into my office this morning. We had both decided that we desperately needed some face-to-face time to talk about the current Doctor Who (our feelings are mixed at ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).