If Zoran could figure itself in the Flip then it can do better than go with CSR. Who knows with all the samrt phone deluge where the next order is going to come from. Zoran meanwhile can do very well to re-evaluate it's core startegy and consolidate it's businesses to cater to a particular segment.
These two companies are twins; the stock chart comparing these two looks practically as if they are the same company. I figure that Zoran was insisting on cash and CSR was looking for a way to spin why they caved - "a lesser offer [in terms of overall valuation] due to recent weakness". The irony is that CSR offers less because Zoran looks weaker of late, and Zoran wants cash because CSR looks... weak[er of late].
These companies are twins. The stock chart comparing these two track practically as if they were the same company. I'm betting Zoran was insisting on cash and CSR wanted a way to spin why they caved ("lesser offer in terms of valuation due to poor recent showing"). The irony is that Zoran's weakness is mirrored by CSR's - CSR offers less because Zoran looks weaker of late and Zoran wants cash because CSR looks... weaker of late.
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.